IETF Logo Mail Archive

[ietf-822] Re: Comment on experimental RFC9078

Taavi Eomäe <taavi@zone.ee> Wed, 17 July 2024 13:04 UTC

Return-Path: <taavi@zone.ee>
X-Original-To: ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08DA1C14F6BE for <ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jul 2024 06:04:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=zone.ee
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nMldSfT3WjCg for <ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jul 2024 06:04:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MTA-244-88.TLL01.ZONEAS.EU (mta-244-88.tll01.zoneas.eu [85.234.244.88]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4693CC14F69F for <ietf-822@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jul 2024 06:04:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zone.ee; q=dns/txt; s=zone; bh=zHdK43sLBwNdQk95/gVbV3zfrdSe5fTOrgA6y8XI2Ug=; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to:references; b=KVGdKm4kfh9AgeTIplP4aX1SO/cgbzeQra5alDILeAr4arn/oUXvSIFDeSPgkY+dZfTKEtF/U BbMtAhlNCNW49/XJNlyhp+ONq2OODobtkkTnIgMxY3nSNG5qNXPQKgOa0sD9nTNBdqrW6XyrDbh 439IBtOTA5NjLJSz5FUihOV1K7iL5ev2K0Q4+hwZ3BHMkAXRwBXsoVfyrblIRPENgcCgqzC86ZL jZk5kiWGPorRmkxAghcXWo733pq5ZBu+TrEqCr5RljKLarlz7+wM/j+HWiC4chccIxnsNbrCWxc PL41F5546geGWN3QnjZ2u1A5y/NzI4bm/6UVG2GBaqHw==
Received: from [192.168.50.11] [217.146.66.6] (Authenticated sender: zmail526721[taavi@zone.ee]) by MTA-244-88.TLL01.ZONEAS.EU (ZoneMTA Forwarder) with ESMTPSA id 190c0cb8a32000e2b3.001 for <ietf-822@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384); Wed, 17 Jul 2024 13:04:43 +0000
Message-ID: <ccabdfd3-92eb-4e3c-9554-808bc91a8f2e@zone.ee>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 16:04:42 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: ietf-822@ietf.org
References: <5cb8ef6f-2b29-4a98-aa87-caad69a8362d@karlewald.de>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Taavi Eomäe <taavi@zone.ee>
Organization: Zone Media OÜ
In-Reply-To: <5cb8ef6f-2b29-4a98-aa87-caad69a8362d@karlewald.de>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms010909080307070809070608"
Message-ID-Hash: 7ZHSR3T2GSR53BJPS7AUK47BVQN4WL3W
X-Message-ID-Hash: 7ZHSR3T2GSR53BJPS7AUK47BVQN4WL3W
X-MailFrom: taavi@zone.ee
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-ietf-822.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [ietf-822] Re: Comment on experimental RFC9078
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Internet Message Format [RFC 822, RFC 2822, RFC 5322]" <ietf-822.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-822/0jg-ZvUWu1upvQcN7QN6DHrVIFU>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-822>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ietf-822-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-822@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ietf-822-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-822-leave@ietf.org>

On 17/07/2024 14:07, Karl Ewald wrote:
> To address the first issue, I suggest a new header, e.g. (for now) 
> X-Reaction-Permitted: true / false 

Headers where the intent is to standardize should probably not use the 
"X" prefix.

v2.35.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status