Re: [ietf-822] WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to...

Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> Sun, 04 May 2014 09:28 UTC

Return-Path: <vesely@tana.it>
X-Original-To: ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 246131A0053 for <ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 May 2014 02:28:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.073
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.073 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cOZC66_dDGEx for <ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 May 2014 02:28:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wmail.tana.it (mail.tana.it [62.94.243.226]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 960A61A004C for <ietf-822@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 May 2014 02:28:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tana.it; s=beta; t=1399195701; bh=QgNP80yoWzIa0IM+8HLqr4kWHn/116vH6cxL7gv08l0=; l=565; h=Date:From:To:CC:References:In-Reply-To; b=Lwa8o0pxbZG91UhlXpqCc9UqGmG6vrQ1zRR3LVCmabi6sdkhc8hCX1CdC9QhfRMK7 tBCjoBmMOqIsSBYVUe7GuG3eCiKg/zVLiFYs8hM8SADcwoHAWUVXrBpspLX/ch9bqo GcOk9GELFsxwdHsyml6xutiOUfEIdrMjVGMLusCM=
Authentication-Results: tana.it; auth=pass (details omitted)
Received: from [172.25.197.88] (pcale.tana [172.25.197.88]) (AUTH: CRAM-MD5 uXDGrn@SYT0/k) by wmail.tana.it with ESMTPA; Sun, 04 May 2014 11:28:21 +0200 id 00000000005DC039.0000000053660835.00003719
Message-ID: <53660835.7060805@tana.it>
Date: Sun, 04 May 2014 11:28:21 +0200
From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
References: <20140418123721.3610.qmail@joyce.lan> <5365357D.2020101@tana.it> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1405031436390.69873@joyce.lan>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1405031436390.69873@joyce.lan>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-822/49uX2_hvTpkCYNOIlAavnhqeVJ8
Cc: ietf-822@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ietf-822] WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to...
X-BeenThere: ietf-822@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Internet Message Format \[RFC 822, RFC 2822, RFC 5322\]" <ietf-822.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-822>, <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-822/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-822@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-822>, <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 May 2014 09:28:26 -0000

On Sat 03/May/2014 20:37:51 +0200 John Levine wrote:
>>   A mailing list MUST NOT tamper with the From: field.  Those who do
>>   that are not mailing lists, and can work their own way out of
>>   DMARC.
> 
> Sorry, no dice.  There are plenty of lists that standardize the header
> syntax.

Isn't that one of those changes that Miles talked about in [1]?
[1] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg87865.html

Many SMTP servers used to standardize message format, and stopped in
order to avoid breaking DKIM signatures.  Won't ML do so too?

Ale