Re: [ietf-822] don't need a permission to re-sign header

[Ned Freed <[e-mail]>]

> >> I've said for years that lists should sign
> >> their mail with their own DKIM keys, and recipients should look at
> >> those list signatures to filter the mail.
> >
> > I'm not even sure that's necessary, but of course it can't hurt. Indeed, right
> > now, with the exception of IETF lists, having a signature makes the odds it's
> > spam more, not less, likely.

> I think that depends on your mail stream.  Google signs all their mail
> including gmail and hosted domains, and that's a big chunk of the mail I
> get.  Yahoo signs all theirs, too.

The overwhelming majority of list spam I get is from Google. All with
nice quthentic DKIM signatures.

				Ned