IETF Logo Mail Archive

[ietf-822] Re: Comment on experimental RFC9078

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Thu, 18 July 2024 22:30 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEE15C1516E2 for <ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jul 2024 15:30:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.157
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.157 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b="CJ3oVHM2"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b="NKvVmPfa"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9YJQtF1t4JCz for <ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jul 2024 15:30:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD849C14F6BC for <ietf-822@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Jul 2024 15:30:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 62978 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2024 22:30:14 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=f5ff66999776.k2407; bh=9bqfs9AY/BdLJ+Zo2xIworik+l6XVtc4Kjc3dS2IlFI=; b=CJ3oVHM24ZkPGeYwhOa6tN9D/20OOXYRVlBwlXVW5lLZoBfOSbPffb4T6ex/nr8tcDGhDcGrZpFWa7O9f+shOkBKbvc3TVdOY2LqqfghYmVg0CByUby/Vm0nWNF76ik8Z4/Qzv8tv7X2qeOKWw7P8z09OvYyQPMh+zoE9x0a8LJ39up9PtAVPk+iViEvjoZ6vcOXEwjg0bijRw3rfwwgTSWI4QLsI7ZUO8IO23xFw20ZSb5e3Yhrs1laQG4yc9mVwLAa9n7/cz5Q+zd/LqhWz8jm9tdAi7djQc6Gj0aFxlGoiYznJ4irwK+E67Fp0mXcTvXJ042fJFTGbnu3T2MhbQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=f5ff66999776.k2407; bh=9bqfs9AY/BdLJ+Zo2xIworik+l6XVtc4Kjc3dS2IlFI=; b=NKvVmPfaVZSckqCJRH4b3REnzp73Tt5eMvQDTG5GQF7Q1Vu7bXlj98UeQdupBqzDBwkA3wwxkJyyvQie4xtSYWqb4Pf6GpBMRoQ0jfDylWMR2RDeS2rSxxpnIQ/fBHlDqeLsjet9E50029kuKr5tLPgu7YzDYnYgl9dwZowUTExotngSzNuVB85+l8WH2H//fG/z1ezxGF8gBMtyvGwabbd+j3XvtwtjTiiYqSf0cdtsMOdmcqxtDphKZqp0QvvMKu/FxvVkh72MCxgpuvmtbKRMsvk3It2EwETEF1Pr5Os8WbaMkcIgGqal/WLHg9Ufovr2RQT0uhAlIjkvGTSw4A==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA CHACHA20-POLY1305 AEAD) via TCP6; 18 Jul 2024 22:30:14 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 2BEF290056AB; Thu, 18 Jul 2024 18:30:13 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 18:30:13 -0400
Message-Id: <20240718223014.2BEF290056AB@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: ietf-822@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <a9d70e90-81d4-460f-af27-c33218151797@tana.it>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
References: <5cb8ef6f-2b29-4a98-aa87-caad69a8362d@karlewald.de> <20240717174311.36CF98FF23D0@ary.qy> <da2d57ec-6925-4fe3-9991-138fb617bade@dcrocker.net> <1a5558ee-0e9d-d31d-37dc-1c19bea7f3e9@taugh.com> <a9d70e90-81d4-460f-af27-c33218151797@tana.it>
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Message-ID-Hash: 53LQVPMIEGKCBBZKDKEDVR2UOKFXXYHK
X-Message-ID-Hash: 53LQVPMIEGKCBBZKDKEDVR2UOKFXXYHK
X-MailFrom: johnl@iecc.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-ietf-822.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: vesely@tana.it
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [ietf-822] Re: Comment on experimental RFC9078
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Internet Message Format [RFC 822, RFC 2822, RFC 5322]" <ietf-822.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-822/6kUvDinKOtPwb5_YaAfkW2hzU70>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-822>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ietf-822-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-822@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ietf-822-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-822-leave@ietf.org>

It appears that Alessandro Vesely  <vesely@tana.it> said:
>What if the MUA I regularly use can handle reactions, but I happen to send a 
>message from another MUA, which doesn't?  Or the other way around.

Then your mail will be inconsistent.

The mail I send from my phone already looks quite different from the mail I
send from my laptop.  That shouldn't be a big surprise to anyone.  And there are
plenty of attachments I can receive on one but not the other, or that look reasonable
on one and useless on the other.

R's,
John

v2.27.6 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status