Re: [ietf-822] WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to...

Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no> Mon, 05 May 2014 07:14 UTC

Return-Path: <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
X-Original-To: ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43BBE1A0262 for <ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 May 2014 00:14:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yag9CVucPMHG for <ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 May 2014 00:14:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from strange.aox.org (strange.aox.org [80.244.248.170]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88B2C1A0164 for <ietf-822@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 May 2014 00:14:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fri.gulbrandsen.priv.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by strange.aox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 411C3FA00CB; Mon, 5 May 2014 07:13:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no by fri.gulbrandsen.priv.no (Archiveopteryx 3.2.0) with esmtpsa id 1399274037-28427-28427/12/7; Mon, 5 May 2014 07:13:57 +0000
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
To: ietf-822@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 05 May 2014 09:13:56 +0200
User-Agent: Trojita/v0.3.96-176-g713fcbb; Qt/4.8.4; X11; Linux; Ubuntu 13.10
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <3e1f9550-9e16-4f16-8e79-62efb2d11bbd@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
In-Reply-To: <01P7EX4Z9V3U000052@mauve.mrochek.com>
References: <5da0fca6-7eb3-4db6-8a71-16fce69e67e6@gulbrandsen.priv.no> <20140504140818.1545.qmail@joyce.lan> <01P7EMAI2KGG000052@mauve.mrochek.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1405041130500.1550@joyce.lan> <01P7EX4Z9V3U000052@mauve.mrochek.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-822/E0aO3Ky1RbjPzhrPINEJ7SSG9MQ
Subject: Re: [ietf-822] WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to...
X-BeenThere: ietf-822@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Internet Message Format \[RFC 822, RFC 2822, RFC 5322\]" <ietf-822.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-822>, <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-822/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-822@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-822>, <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 May 2014 07:14:04 -0000

Ned Freed answers John Levine:
>> Per-user whitelisting on List-ID strikes me has having horrible scaling
>> issues.
>
> Really? Given that we've seen per-user per-sender blacklists implemented  
on
> massive scale with no scaling issues, I for one fail to see the issue.

Isn't this kind of whitelisting more or less what gmail does with the new 
"unsubscribe" button?

Arnt