IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-822] More encoding (was Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-crocker-inreply-react-02.txt)

Ricardo Signes <rjbs@semiotic.systems> Sun, 18 October 2020 21:00 UTC

Return-Path: <rjbs@semiotic.systems>
X-Original-To: ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BED5E3A0C53 for <ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 14:00:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=semiotic.systems header.b=ljL/XOXt; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=Fr9pP69m
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id COZoYBVi23V3 for <ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 14:00:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18BF73A0C4F for <ietf-822@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 14:00:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C2F1D31 for <ietf-822@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 17:00:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap35 ([10.202.2.85]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 18 Oct 2020 17:00:05 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= semiotic.systems; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to :references:date:from:to:subject:content-type; s=fm2; bh=VzCj8yU 9bIwvuoIhWey2GzcX7vvNWNcmtpo6MTYS0TU=; b=ljL/XOXtyuwtpuQRS44pa8u P5sJ7ybKM/XJDhpjPRM7HJK0iBEG2skbZGXSRKNdch2Sx8z5w9lcvbETcaQLFD88 ezQsDOWEGOGRSaKpMj9+bV73hhj/9oBZR0eo8AdKiss9ZPDevwfJqyUjzNlR0PBr rMHaJ6gMAfQ02kJJo4lyIHrbScOEFOho74BYufp/k9OQvRsWPY0AM3o9NgfsXmcL WfsIL5CT3NElMlv0wKobGC7IDozLxDWW5yE1bb1Mm50ZONeLbLRPWCehDm6OS9jQ d0/c36yBZbbEGRZ/BoBzqt8fiOVqkLDL3nPN5DNtJD3IEH9T3wSzN2zfCzt80Ww= =
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=VzCj8y U9bIwvuoIhWey2GzcX7vvNWNcmtpo6MTYS0TU=; b=Fr9pP69m1Aj0iBKJPn4sC4 iEkwMfAvwQsoVqYfkSrlCFZvZ+aNBBoWkNDASEu9HJ98sTcBOAi9YIG+ypW6fuvb U/I7mUhYNnyo/mMGqrbRUQU7hAOPRxR+D6Pe9xDzm3YAdXCoiEN+d5E2NDabklQ8 7FAqWfsj0D0QjHYUlwl6jABC3tombDDaK0VPz9ZeOA0ckYZXS4tBSPAkKJQHa11m eFKroQmvqW2axCKQ1vTROfZDkc0HsRaEKeALIkQ9A3Lae6NiKoWD5L/FY0Tjcj5r ze5KA+2WRzuLpKGOtf7Id6T/i+NrrZvd6RSivAuGo4pz3Y2RtFAutIHocdB6Kq3A ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:06yMX6BlUcuZ7AChNLgJ7NdMglvB2x7pnzeNNnibp5vaZawRHAmzjA> <xme:06yMX0ghbGqYtuAf3UjKfpq2BChEMSv158f4wBHqd57Q8iqf2PxweR8Sgze4s8ClF GqVa-6Vo5O3uqtJiTM>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrieelgdduheejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsegrtd erreerreejnecuhfhrohhmpedftfhitggrrhguohcuufhighhnvghsfdcuoehrjhgsshes shgvmhhiohhtihgtrdhshihsthgvmhhsqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeufefhtdfftd ffleekudelveeliedvieefveeiveffudevheektdfggeffhedvgfenucevlhhushhtvghr ufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehrjhgsshesshgvmhhiohhtih gtrdhshihsthgvmhhs
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:06yMX9kzsYs3LTZ5wHrEF91dh_88QtM97uN88gTLvYDWe86q1ZxJSA> <xmx:06yMX4x19-30GP9gzcBYuFf_suumWUvaK8U4yGRcWVoA4hnAwJA8rA> <xmx:06yMX_SYTKeucKu4-6TUfAgnckO8RHG3sLzFw3HW4WomoCba4tgmvA> <xmx:1KyMX2fkDGDSw76N-U78z3P_fIQYl2Mt1Ki7SuPRssZqCp0UXdn4Ow>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 1CB0F14C08A7; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 17:00:01 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.3.0-489-gf39678d-fm-20201011.001-gf39678d0
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <35be40c6-9f47-4930-a411-e391cd5dc4a4@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <01RQYDVJUD5A005PTU@mauve.mrochek.com>
References: <8e06bde3-b344-466f-8ac8-313d70436cb4@dcrocker.net> <20201016223329.CD0202388361@ary.qy> <01RQVRJMP1T2005PTU@mauve.mrochek.com> <5504edd0-57c2-ed94-07a0-402a655e9ad8@dcrocker.net> <01RQYDVJUD5A005PTU@mauve.mrochek.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 16:59:40 -0400
From: Ricardo Signes <rjbs@semiotic.systems>
To: ietf-822@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="73aab80f60b7447892d80e7df4697b8f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-822/OaHbgPkWqCw2kYPAsotEUWEEq7o>
Subject: Re: [ietf-822] More encoding (was Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-crocker-inreply-react-02.txt)
X-BeenThere: ietf-822@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Internet Message Format \[RFC 822, RFC 2822, RFC 5322\]" <ietf-822.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-822>, <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-822/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-822@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-822>, <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 21:00:09 -0000


On Sun, Oct 18, 2020, at 4:00 PM, Ned Freed wrote:
>>  [ … U+1Fxxx …]
>> Thoughts?
> 
> My thought is "no". It's not that encoded-words are great, it's that they enjoy
> universal deployment. Use encoded-words and access to the unencoded form is one
> routine call away, if that. Anything else is more work, and no matter how much
> better is looks to coding geeks, it's still nonsense to users.

Totally agreed.

-- 
rjbs

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email