IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-822] A "Reaction" strawman to throw into the mix

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Mon, 02 November 2020 18:00 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63AB33A135F for <ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 10:00:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.147
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.147 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.247, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id weJZijSs8Pt6 for <ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 10:00:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from simon.songbird.com (simon.songbird.com [72.52.113.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3DAC3A1314 for <ietf-822@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 10:00:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.109] (c-24-130-62-181.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.130.62.181]) (authenticated bits=0) by simon.songbird.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id 0A2I3VCS023351 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for <ietf-822@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 10:03:31 -0800
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
To: ietf-822@ietf.org
References: <B6A2D19C-1790-4ACC-857B-DA4AFD0D4A86@episteme.net> <4457df09-cbf8-f61d-30f0-a7a73f6cd960@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <a02f4a31-3ff6-82c1-bb42-0ef782e315d6@dcrocker.net>
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2020 10:00:00 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4457df09-cbf8-f61d-30f0-a7a73f6cd960@dcrocker.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-822/f2JG568BTW4ZTO5YH0Szl_WFCYQ>
Subject: Re: [ietf-822] A "Reaction" strawman to throw into the mix
X-BeenThere: ietf-822@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Internet Message Format \[RFC 822, RFC 2822, RFC 5322\]" <ietf-822.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-822>, <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-822/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-822@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-822>, <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2020 18:00:36 -0000

On 11/2/2020 9:24 AM, Dave Crocker wrote:
> term "laying violation"

sigh.  challenging pronunciation apparently infected my typing (and my 
proofreading)...

    laying -> layering

of course.

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email