Re: [ietf-822] utf8 messages
Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Wed, 27 August 2014 15:02 UTC
Return-Path: <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A6481A0AD4 for <ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 08:02:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.868
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.868 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YR8Eb3H7sEVL for <ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 08:02:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppsw-52.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-52.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 186A01A0AD9 for <ietf-822@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 08:02:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
Received: from hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.51]:47197) by ppsw-52.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.159]:25) with esmtpa (EXTERNAL:fanf2) id 1XMekC-0002LZ-DT (Exim 4.82_3-c0e5623) (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Wed, 27 Aug 2014 16:02:40 +0100
Received: from fanf2 by hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk (hermes.cam.ac.uk) with local id 1XMekC-0003TW-3n (Exim 4.72) (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Wed, 27 Aug 2014 16:02:40 +0100
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 16:02:40 +0100
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
X-X-Sender: fanf2@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk
To: Mark Martinec <Mark.Martinec+ietf@ijs.si>
In-Reply-To: <38adf1fa5904098dd896002fec51583d@mailbox.ijs.si>
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1408271600260.23119@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <CABa8R6tWEhjjZSvq6NbM7EimokOms3suZufn0-6N1SB_fzGM8Q@mail.gmail.com> <01PB9FABWA4E0000SM@mauve.mrochek.com> <CABa8R6tns-idiZTj=+vb9fVNyH-nNYT+w9oNMb80XbCs5osvFw@mail.gmail.com> <01PBABOOL4QO0000SM@mauve.mrochek.com> <CABa8R6vBqS1ewmTtHh8tTOdzobsWpvSEokRxOqpj1Oq3hA+vsw@mail.gmail.com> <D0111ECB.195FD%dvargha@mimecast.com> <38adf1fa5904098dd896002fec51583d@mailbox.ijs.si>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LSU 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: Tony Finch <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-822/koow4l-HywUE3qHYzVEFs6lt0kU
Cc: ietf-822@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ietf-822] utf8 messages
X-BeenThere: ietf-822@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Internet Message Format \[RFC 822, RFC 2822, RFC 5322\]" <ietf-822.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-822>, <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-822/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-822@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-822>, <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 15:02:45 -0000
Mark Martinec <Mark.Martinec+ietf@ijs.si> wrote: > > It is not possible (even in the absence of SMTPUTF8 support) to be > able to transfer e-mail messages with no out-of-band ("metadata" / > envelope) information. The most obvious reason is the list of > recipient addresses, which is not present in a message itself. That is what the BCC: header is for (before message submission, if not at other times). > Envelope sender may or may not be present in a mail header > (as a Return-Path header field). Right. > Other examples are RFC 3461 data (RET, ENVID, NOTIFY, ORCPT). I think it was a mistake not to specify in-header versions of those directives. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <dot@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ Trafalgar: Cyclonic in northwest, otherwise mainly northerly or northwesterly 5 or 6. Slight or moderate. Showers in northwest. Good.
- [ietf-822] utf8 messages Brandon Long
- Re: [ietf-822] utf8 messages Ned Freed
- Re: [ietf-822] utf8 messages Brandon Long
- Re: [ietf-822] utf8 messages Mark Martinec
- Re: [ietf-822] utf8 messages Ned Freed
- Re: [ietf-822] utf8 messages Jan Kundrát
- Re: [ietf-822] utf8 messages Ned Freed
- Re: [ietf-822] utf8 messages Brandon Long
- Re: [ietf-822] utf8 messages Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [ietf-822] utf8 messages Daniel Vargha
- Re: [ietf-822] utf8 messages Mark Martinec
- Re: [ietf-822] utf8 messages Ned Freed
- Re: [ietf-822] utf8 messages Daniel Vargha
- Re: [ietf-822] utf8 messages Brandon Long
- Re: [ietf-822] utf8 messages Ned Freed
- Re: [ietf-822] utf8 messages Ned Freed
- Re: [ietf-822] utf8 messages Brandon Long
- Re: [ietf-822] utf8 messages Ned Freed
- Re: [ietf-822] utf8 messages Jan Kundrát
- Re: [ietf-822] utf8 messages Daniel Vargha
- Re: [ietf-822] utf8 messages Ned Freed
- Re: [ietf-822] utf8 messages Daniel Vargha
- Re: [ietf-822] utf8 messages Brandon Long
- Re: [ietf-822] utf8 messages Ned Freed
- Re: [ietf-822] utf8 messages Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: [ietf-822] utf8 messages Mark Martinec
- Re: [ietf-822] utf8 messages Jan Kundrát
- Re: [ietf-822] utf8 messages Ned Freed
- Re: [ietf-822] utf8 messages Ned Freed
- Re: [ietf-822] utf8 messages Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: [ietf-822] utf8 messages Tony Finch
- Re: [ietf-822] utf8 messages Ned Freed
- Re: [ietf-822] utf8 messages Mark Martinec
- Re: [ietf-822] utf8 messages Chris Newman