Re: [ietf-822] WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to...

Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> Sun, 04 May 2014 20:56 UTC

Return-Path: <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>
X-Original-To: ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B05A1A012B for <ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 May 2014 13:56:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MhuJNR8AGobA for <ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 May 2014 13:56:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server1.neighborhoods.net (server1.neighborhoods.net [207.154.13.48]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF7871A012A for <ietf-822@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 May 2014 13:56:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by server1.neighborhoods.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3B37CC0C0 for <ietf-822@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 May 2014 16:56:20 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.6.2 (20081215) (Debian) at neighborhoods.net
Received: from server1.neighborhoods.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server1.neighborhoods.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 19DvsC+LBt7S for <ietf-822@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 May 2014 16:40:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from Miles-Fidelmans-MacBook-Pro.local (173-162-235-46-NewEngland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.162.235.46]) by server1.neighborhoods.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 177C4CC0BC for <ietf-822@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 May 2014 16:40:45 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <5366A5D2.9000902@meetinghouse.net>
Date: Sun, 04 May 2014 16:40:50 -0400
From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf-822@ietf.org
References: <20140504131330.1184.qmail@joyce.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20140504131330.1184.qmail@joyce.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-822/lghPfS9ZDh1Q7KTToAGJU9gL8I0
Subject: Re: [ietf-822] WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to...
X-BeenThere: ietf-822@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Internet Message Format \[RFC 822, RFC 2822, RFC 5322\]" <ietf-822.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-822>, <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-822/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-822@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-822>, <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 May 2014 20:56:26 -0000

John Levine wrote:
>> No, all you need to do is admit that the mailing list server sent the
>> message that came from the mailing list server - so set that to be the
>> From/return-path.
> Besides the semantic wrongness of this approach and the confusion
> between envelope and header addresses, it has the severe practical
> problem that the address of the actual author of the message no long
> appears in a header, so there's no way to reply to her.

one obvious partial fix is a "originally-from:" header - I seem to have 
seen comments that Google Groups is adding an "x-originally-from" header 
to list traffic.

a longer-term fix would seem to be to get serious about an effort to 
develop SMTP2, or some such refactoring that incorporates 
authentication, integrity, and mailing list functions into the message 
format and SMTP state machine definition in a standard way (any ideas 
who might fund some focused work in that regard, the way ARPA and NSF 
used to fund protocol work?)

Miles Fidelman

-- 
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is.   .... Yogi Berra