IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-822] WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to...

"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Sun, 04 May 2014 15:42 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B56E1A00D5 for <ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 May 2014 08:42:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.357
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.357 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B4zuMQHfQDuF for <ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 May 2014 08:42:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46C251A00A8 for <ietf-822@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 May 2014 08:42:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 91398 invoked from network); 4 May 2014 15:42:49 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent:cleverness; s=16505.53665ff9.k1405; bh=XtWj/je2x7mEpGMeUh5FwaV5mF+A2ATvXsfPLYkXjsA=; b=T5uOMSEuRshslnMPp3LzXxX6FYtDmT4cB1mFcv3CfqvGyu5QmGjsQQ5cj3BkOg8bKW8YS0WqUJEbgcImLUeR7VL3lSkzLrU+yPO3mHyxzcW9XzAtgxpfdHIOf7KBwaHHxXOEzc7K3dI2n934iZ9aaZUSAnT9J9KA26iL1R7/DuC/5ucygHZrG9P44eIXujCU8ApbUksvgHxn3NhnjR5zhNsfbzxpqBX4Dsp0oQm9auu8t2PpOJqPsejpUEkZeGqH
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent:cleverness; s=16505.53665ff9.k1405; bh=XtWj/je2x7mEpGMeUh5FwaV5mF+A2ATvXsfPLYkXjsA=; b=JfzRFqXpSfqtex7oVoRLeMym/O0VbvOu+JGrHq2HgqhOHTR5Cw2m3hif8Ux3atePlIPJB8RfV0i51/ncjuk6D1t7/UDK1xswnLRcG47EJPPURBYIn51vnk9ODYqvgr8maGREAZWAHt8ATyyH/Z15cRK0G1UmqEb7BJ5XtOI1RTN183+c2vd+wpOBeO+RSEp56ZVQYlnyuWjqAxbrlmXAQ0cCZQRjwkJ2vSB+QORSpjO2r1Lo4zLF0St6qloh8Ufw
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.0/X.509/SHA1) via TCP6; 04 May 2014 15:42:49 -0000
Date: Sun, 04 May 2014 11:42:48 -0400
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1405041140520.1550@joyce.lan>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
In-Reply-To: <01P7EMOS2VGA000052@mauve.mrochek.com>
References: <20140418123721.3610.qmail@joyce.lan> <5365357D.2020101@tana.it> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1405031436390.69873@joyce.lan> <53660835.7060805@tana.it> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1405040902410.1013@joyce.lan> <01P7EMOS2VGA000052@mauve.mrochek.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
Cleverness: None detected
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-822/sNN3OVmIqhKLUDuSV8G3PQZeiOQ
Cc: ietf-822@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ietf-822] WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to...
X-BeenThere: ietf-822@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Internet Message Format \[RFC 822, RFC 2822, RFC 5322\]" <ietf-822.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-822>, <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-822/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-822@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-822>, <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 May 2014 15:42:54 -0000

> No, he's not. A lot of changes done by SMTP servers have been disabled 
> to deal with DKIM. SUBMIT and delivery time fixups are not being 
> disabled AFAICT; nobody cares about end users being able to apply or 
> check DKIM signatures.

I've always had a separation between relay and submission, so the fixup 
issues never came up here.  (It's one of qmail's virtues.)  Dunno what the 
timeline has been for other MTAs.

In this particular case, I was more thinking that some combination of the 
mailing list software and the submission server the list uses would tidy 
up the headers.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email