IETF Logo Mail Archive

[ietf-822] Re: Comment on experimental RFC9078

John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Sun, 21 July 2024 15:06 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 544C2C180B41 for <ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Jul 2024 08:06:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.408
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.408 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b="WAb0rlIK"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b="gcDS9Stq"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cvx09sqmZkIf for <ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Jul 2024 08:06:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 429DFC16943E for <ietf-822@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Jul 2024 08:06:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 19799 invoked from network); 21 Jul 2024 15:06:20 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=4d54669d23ec.k2407; bh=kb4lmAcwXSf2NiQZ/yecimISEr2/LOAZwtCwkITVPrc=; b=WAb0rlIKqXuc6yjRZwH8bu3BraK3vUvrgJJH4mBpK7Qn8l9DXzw/VYpKNVWQE1Ttox3KLPfNJu9vUO3k/JybkoEIcaQGPdKpoyxceAFfM3AZEcTUbiFKXXeYYFeUXGRJ+zdUHppEKTFVKPT2eqA/bQjc2mAuraeG4ALAHKhp5ea16V7jI59NHKBBlfEaVJy54hVM5XTDIUCgz5bAcHcCjDSIieCxr+yDtOaawmz+UB7+QE01wzJ01J5XcaJnG8D4SYBtPJrCtdHD5CDpB7lT2UXl83ix6wab/ZnlH+s80Y+4JTHlb6XxQMNVLov7A/kctoszM4skD1Br+48S6FEZJw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=4d54669d23ec.k2407; bh=kb4lmAcwXSf2NiQZ/yecimISEr2/LOAZwtCwkITVPrc=; b=gcDS9StqXbgHXY5nt+YySAZGb/aoWAiEa6drn8+kizAAP4AooIkl9GsGxWSIs2B3KcHKN3d/PEVmhyodjUAxdvTSToaau4dae+q3xPdwWGYwG4VWTb5PMBFIWGbLmHoxRhbGcjlGUFctiLFPlyiGN7UCKG38MXgc99B6PGOh9oTbIzvHKWZJpyUXjgnvwaWdeyzXMlVCbziAqrS8gYr0o9lHQnwVlL889hmmFwET/k9xkXADhbaUfFl/k2lcqkIIYxnzx664g8Ouok1UzWG+INpJk2cXj6Xff8sdznza0Bt/fI5TDtJSGsSziUY68JNwbt0L6JkKweA+pD8xV2m/Eg==
Received: from ary.local ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA CHACHA20-POLY1305 AEAD) via TCP6; 21 Jul 2024 15:06:20 -0000
Received: by ary.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 7C41E9025E8F; Sun, 21 Jul 2024 11:06:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ary.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 352C39025E71; Sun, 21 Jul 2024 11:06:19 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2024 11:06:19 -0400
Message-ID: <c8ecde33-7822-7171-5fee-b5a74bf7c695@taugh.com>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>, ietf-822@ietf.org
X-X-Sender: johnl@ary.local
In-Reply-To: <f19ff82e-13cf-41db-950f-74e212887bd2@tana.it>
References: <5cb8ef6f-2b29-4a98-aa87-caad69a8362d@karlewald.de> <20240717174311.36CF98FF23D0@ary.qy> <da2d57ec-6925-4fe3-9991-138fb617bade@dcrocker.net> <1a5558ee-0e9d-d31d-37dc-1c19bea7f3e9@taugh.com> <a9d70e90-81d4-460f-af27-c33218151797@tana.it> <20240718223014.2BEF290056AB@ary.qy> <ebf93516-9224-4971-9dd6-f50504425e9c@tana.it> <7629cf49-f91b-15bc-db02-af6e1b85842a@taugh.com> <f19ff82e-13cf-41db-950f-74e212887bd2@tana.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID-Hash: WEHLL2DSYQYCNDP74IX5A6UHO4UJXKUP
X-Message-ID-Hash: WEHLL2DSYQYCNDP74IX5A6UHO4UJXKUP
X-MailFrom: johnl@taugh.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-ietf-822.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [ietf-822] Re: Comment on experimental RFC9078
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Internet Message Format [RFC 822, RFC 2822, RFC 5322]" <ietf-822.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-822/vg6v2RkOD9sxssIX0tt4QWvjcyM>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-822>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ietf-822-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-822@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ietf-822-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-822-leave@ietf.org>

On Sun, 21 Jul 2024, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
>> If you want to get rid of reactions or shunt them to a separate folder, the 
>> IETF-ish way to do that is SIEVE in the MDA.  But that's a separate issue.
>
> I think nobody wants to see reactions in the same guise as regular email 
> messages, except perhaps for debugging purposes.  Moving to a different 
> folder works for both types of MUAs, reaction capable and non-capable. 
> Should standardize the folder name, e.g. Reactions.  A user can go there to 
> see the gory details of reaction messages.  Otherwise, the (capable) MUA 
> should display some kind of summary in relation to the messages they refer 
> to, no?

Sorry, but no.  This is a lot of mechanism based on guesses about how MUAs 
might work that are probably wrong.

>> Other than virus filtering my MDA doesn't look at attachments and lets the 
>> MUAs deal with them.
>
> Doesn't it open attachments of messages in the aggregate reports folder?

No, of course not.  It delivers DMARC reports to a python script that does 
stuff with them.

R's,
John

v2.27.8 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status