IETF Logo Mail Archive

[ietf-822] Re: Looking for Feedback on "Wrong Recipient" Proposal

Richard Clayton <richard@highwayman.com> Mon, 29 July 2024 13:23 UTC

Return-Path: <richard@highwayman.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4447C14F747 for <ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jul 2024 06:23:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=highwayman.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NKf5iVB9MqgI for <ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jul 2024 06:23:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.highwayman.com (mail.highwayman.com [82.69.6.249]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2456C14F5E2 for <ietf-822@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jul 2024 06:23:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=highwayman.com; s=rnc1; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From: To:Date:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=XNKik2dpI+Gju2qB/s2pf3ep29qM5A1TPFVzQYfnV44=; t=1722259433; x=1723123433; b=rrox/y3XgBd67d8wjKfp0Ik4ND+F/VFpZQHpU2RwAVrcBgMQkVlmIkKvHBWixcoa3nz15MrOSmd VwVA9/oI0P33mAWXOHlZWMdgQrT17/0PFiY0ijqVj3OSVUjS9V2YckJLMI1ySUbvF/5eHKptzkkEq 6wVxqnVS4H+bGYfHgEdNeD7vTpn0/1ndro36tFPH5dj4I127l3ACHAVS7UuaVABUeIRmvnqVRtxSZ RUbFd/c1v/FGFAr+/kUBObcZIE4xuFe87JYlLPzYK5kxeOK7NO+o03O4zytnxKj/3JRQnkPDoRS1S U+OZYJOsDv048NZadW1Ezc6cAQpJlFeTrDbw==;
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (port=12050 helo=happyday.al.cl.cam.ac.uk) by mail.highwayman.com with esmtp (Exim 4.98) (envelope-from <richard@highwayman.com>) id 1sYQLv-00000000ICV-0rpv for ietf-822@ietf.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2024 13:23:51 +0000
Message-ID: <2$kO5SBae5pmFAO+@highwayman.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 14:22:34 +0100
To: ietf-822@ietf.org
From: Richard Clayton <richard@highwayman.com>
References: <CAD0F4NgQD9iDL9zBLYq+54SyM5AksQxNeztyFEOBHDf7YQAfGQ@mail.gmail.com> <03d6354e-c068-478f-adc1-5ea031b24df1@tana.it>
In-Reply-To: <03d6354e-c068-478f-adc1-5ea031b24df1@tana.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Turnpike Integrated Version 5.03 M <rI2$+3Tj77vtoNKLzib+d+uJJl>
Message-ID-Hash: 6UKJRD77UEUCHKQBG6LRHTDT3QFJYDH7
X-Message-ID-Hash: 6UKJRD77UEUCHKQBG6LRHTDT3QFJYDH7
X-MailFrom: richard@highwayman.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-ietf-822.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [ietf-822] Re: Looking for Feedback on "Wrong Recipient" Proposal
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Internet Message Format [RFC 822, RFC 2822, RFC 5322]" <ietf-822.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-822/xFTKLmG6LkBttDVlkAUWSAgE1UU>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-822>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ietf-822-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-822@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ietf-822-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-822-leave@ietf.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In message <03d6354e-c068-478f-adc1-5ea031b24df1@tana.it>, Alessandro
Vesely <vesely@tana.it> writes

>Wouldn't it be simpler to piggyback directly onto rfc 8058?  I mean something 
>like:
>
>List-Unsubscribe-Post: List-Unsubscribe=Wrong-Recipient
>
>(A more elaborate syntax could allow to offer multiple choices of the 
>unsubscribe reason, e.g. One-Click/ Wrong-Recipient/ Fed-Up/ ...)

more elaborate syntax assumes an enthusiasm by mailbox providers to
create an elaborate UI for what is currently reasonably simple

why do you need to tell the sender why the unsubscribe has occurred ?
what do you imagine they are going to do differently ??

is it perhaps that you merely want to see 1-click-unsub on a wider range
of email than Yahgoogle currently requires it ? because if so, lobbying
large MBPs is probably going to more effective (and possibly even
quicker) than trying to build a email standards camel to rival the DNS
version.

- -- 
richard                                                   Richard Clayton

Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary 
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Benjamin Franklin 11 Nov 1755

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPsdk version 1.7.1

iQA/AwUBZqeXmt2nQQHFxEViEQKSKwCfYplNkE5HXVvZxzx6dZ5MjDivI50AnjR3
+z/wFvg+cxdsFaSlERzaadC2
=tzg5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

v2.27.6 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status