Re: empty quoted strings and other oddities

Bruce Lilly <blilly@erols.com> Wed, 02 October 2002 10:37 UTC

Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by above.proper.com (8.11.6/8.11.3) id g92AbaY08389 for ietf-822-bks; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 03:37:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.61]) by above.proper.com (8.11.6/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g92AbZv08384 for <ietf-822@imc.org>; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 03:37:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 209-122-228-17.s952.apx1.nyw.ny.dialup.rcn.com ([209.122.228.17] helo=mail.blilly.com) by smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 17wgsl-0005bg-00 for ietf-822@imc.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2002 06:37:32 -0400
Received: from mail.blilly.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.blilly.com with ESMTP id g92AbNSN019334(8.12.3/8.12.3/SuSE Linux 0.6/2002-07-27 16:10:46); Wed, 2 Oct 2002 06:37:23 -0400
Received: from alex.blilly.com (alex.blilly.com [192.168.99.6]) by mail.blilly.com with ESMTP id g92AbLvu019333(8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit/2002-06-01 20:08:15); Wed, 2 Oct 2002 06:37:23 -0400
Message-ID: <3D9ACC60.30701@alex.blilly.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 06:37:20 -0400
From: Bruce Lilly <blilly@erols.com>
Reply-To: ietf-822@imc.org
Organization: Bruce Lilly
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2a) Gecko/20020910
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, fr, ru, ja
MIME-Version: 1.0
CC: ietf-822@imc.org
Subject: Re: empty quoted strings and other oddities
References: <200210011513.g91FDk027592@astro.cs.utk.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavis-milter (http://amavis.org/)
Sender: owner-ietf-822@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-822/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-822.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-822-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>

Keith Moore wrote:
>>RFC 2822 permits (as did 822) a quoted string which
>>consists solely of a pair of DQUOTE characters.  It's
>>not clear what the semantics of that are or ought to be.
> 
> 
> it doesn't have to have semantics, since quoted-strings
> can be used in places where they are opaque.  if someone wants their 
> email address to be ""@example.com this is perfectly legal.

OK, I'll buy that (at least 2821 and 2822 are consistent
in permitting it).

>>Likewise, a domain literal can consist solely of the
>>square brackets.
> 
> 
> so? there are lots of addresses which are valid syntax but 
> not valid because the domain is not defined or the IP
> address (in the domain literal) does not exist or is not
> assigned to a host.

I'm not sure that there aren't MTAs or MUAs that would
break or pass bizarre requests to DNS when trying to
deal with [] as a domain literal.

Also, in this case 2822 seems to be alone in permitting
that syntax, which is not permitted by 2821 or 1123.