[ietf-822] Re: Comment on experimental RFC9078
Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Wed, 17 July 2024 20:55 UTC
Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10E4EC14F61D for <ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jul 2024 13:55:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dcrocker.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pKaDq9gKo4Qa for <ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jul 2024 13:55:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hedgehog.birch.relay.mailchannels.net (hedgehog.birch.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.209.81]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9580C1CAE77 for <ietf-822@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jul 2024 13:55:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Sender-Id: hostingeremail|x-authuser|dhc@dcrocker.net
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30993504FF3 for <ietf-822@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jul 2024 20:55:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from uk-fast-smtpout5.hostinger.io (unknown [127.0.0.6]) (Authenticated sender: hostingeremail) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 66DAA505225 for <ietf-822@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jul 2024 20:55:11 +0000 (UTC)
ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-2022; d=mailchannels.net; t=1721249711; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=0J6n/p/lETFOzppenRBgM3SIrr8jF7I3jI1YIoLIKD1WGE8q/WYsv4futRCwD2L95HweYU u774nyizUI2OP+jdigZkCv/JLIyeiX5YT5TwjUHNpqaEEqxcgRq7tBp/+x96zpldLsM2qb B22gXNQItio0xpbh2LX2XscwgacEnfqPIlDmkokQgJ+avw15D/fcXaycM05Umu7JRmOECy bvbmhsnFLwM2h0+fVWCqJPyBC+V71GEKB1YcrriND9hSVlT1pXxlDtUK8ky17Kgt3NxFN/ qXSqvLaqRKCC4gf/2wPa0eN59NYjz6Q6+SO5Nh2aFJLxumsu8glNQ4jHmG9t+g==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailchannels.net; s=arc-2022; t=1721249711; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=J78WrZhpkUuKHEiWQfInIa7BQ0Kmmr0qnIDV9YjqrTM=; b=gO/tN5u883q1J9XeWPoZsg0i1Dn5sbiO0CN/M3DaB/XAECzvoCXhpLUMQrDvBNaealPGaM 79xGtHnpJfRybcOXpH0UPsMPZFjka3O5Cw/syPgXDiAceP+zbUjEK5GaW1uV2EYz3J+uXT 9+Z+xDN5ix/jMwyINMZde0PaF4YIQl9dVHhWXhCYco89AHlnwwv/WACR4mcDq9gUDE8Dhk MpzePhImOAOacWyoHu/YaFBatTgNLcK53GkdDZ/WB8T3yPTFUh4IqAXyO8u0mI+aGqKiad U0uXqcmcpJeALhoESDiOkNr5eMDixPlU/qVnGjZxQwsQHjHrcSNHMEgcvN+ikQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; rspamd-585d4c99d7-nmt8g; auth=pass smtp.auth=hostingeremail smtp.mailfrom=dhc@dcrocker.net
X-Sender-Id: hostingeremail|x-authuser|dhc@dcrocker.net
X-MC-Relay: Neutral
X-MailChannels-SenderId: hostingeremail|x-authuser|dhc@dcrocker.net
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: hostingeremail
X-Wide-Eyed-Turn: 79c2312d2db6bc52_1721249712026_2724018161
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1721249712026:2621155256
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1721249712026
Received: from uk-fast-smtpout5.hostinger.io (uk-fast-smtpout5.hostinger.io [31.220.23.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by 100.115.133.214 (trex/7.0.2); Wed, 17 Jul 2024 20:55:12 +0000
Message-ID: <9f89a9d1-2a60-42b0-a6f2-1a8f35356712@dcrocker.net>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dcrocker.net; s=hostingermail-a; t=1721249709; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=J78WrZhpkUuKHEiWQfInIa7BQ0Kmmr0qnIDV9YjqrTM=; b=r+7cNLoYiIaNJBeDe7GY75nzHuP+dMlCjkDsEfkqYKcN6e6kuf1nOleRJAULBtAMqim6o/ mLF7u7juhSJYe9qYub/B2LuHZ4axr/WfRhAdBKL3d8ocZGBZXPZhRSPFnYVb3ORQjvxEf6 igqI7UjZjDNqI7tds3UnV+93pEFqFi5ixfLwBXaX6F1jWKhfjMAsu7FEL0l83etwV5Z1WI BWFTZJDVDDVEFkx9V2w6vO6ejRaXlw9iV8tn0sIUW8hh/5KA3A0ff3RD4q24SOqhyLoPa5 L6R/1QT9zTTDViPDXzwU77F1Ni9eKXZPGlRa6l/rlb23LFVxSud7v0kf5Hqz1w==
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 13:54:34 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, ietf-822@ietf.org
References: <5cb8ef6f-2b29-4a98-aa87-caad69a8362d@karlewald.de> <20240717174311.36CF98FF23D0@ary.qy> <da2d57ec-6925-4fe3-9991-138fb617bade@dcrocker.net> <1a5558ee-0e9d-d31d-37dc-1c19bea7f3e9@taugh.com>
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
In-Reply-To: <1a5558ee-0e9d-d31d-37dc-1c19bea7f3e9@taugh.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-CM-Envelope: MS4xfCGDPCJlqQpL65ohzNyCI7YkIlzNMmywktJ/ZLzIHqhMhn+s0Kb2y596bBNeMtaBIbuMPRhgdTz76lDiMpmuBOuP7FpHaK1a3XXNso8XPcbZBUQdpf6C sRO+rVP1eiYmjOGEfAFNGKL6SYJmTVT+d4QNJKUoxhBnS7KICzquC9hJA3QR2UGczVPSMb1QHXfxCGi8U5TFYwjHUFmjadgZINY=
X-CM-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=TcnEtgQh c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=66982fad a=f0NN86htvrvSmWFZ/FiWJw==:117 a=f0NN86htvrvSmWFZ/FiWJw==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=k7Ga1wGzAAAA:8 a=2p6v9SGFzNU_E93IIw4A:9 a=3ZKOabzyN94A:10 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=ijMaxGghyylP-n2pFjDB:22
X-AuthUser: dhc@dcrocker.net
Message-ID-Hash: 5NVCZPWLIBJ5MNLVUCL6XK3P7R4ZM7A3
X-Message-ID-Hash: 5NVCZPWLIBJ5MNLVUCL6XK3P7R4ZM7A3
X-MailFrom: dhc@dcrocker.net
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-ietf-822.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
Subject: [ietf-822] Re: Comment on experimental RFC9078
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Internet Message Format [RFC 822, RFC 2822, RFC 5322]" <ietf-822.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-822/zHhkPZ2RssxiQTwS5965UL0tupI>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-822>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ietf-822-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-822@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ietf-822-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-822-leave@ietf.org>
On 7/17/2024 12:58 PM, John R Levine wrote: > On Wed, 17 Jul 2024, Dave Crocker wrote: >> This is a special case of generally indicating the replies will not >> be accepted. Or maybe just that they are not desired. > It's more subtle than that. If you have a UA that understands > reactions, it can display them in a way that makes sense, but if you > don't, as he said, they're ugly and annoying. This is a hint to the > recipient's system whether to enable the reaction menu or just regular > replies. Perhaps you are correct. It's not as if people have had varying reactions to various aspects of replies, over the decades. Or perhaps there is a general topic, with assorted variations and considerations. Possibly even as I was trying to suggest. UX/UI issues abound in email. This is just a very, very specialized example. Typically, each one fits within a more generic communication concern. As I was trying to suggest. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net mast:@dcrocker@mastodon.social
- [ietf-822] Comment on experimental RFC9078 Karl Ewald
- [ietf-822] Re: Comment on experimental RFC9078 John C Klensin
- [ietf-822] Re: Comment on experimental RFC9078 Taavi Eomäe
- [ietf-822] Re: Comment on experimental RFC9078 Dave Crocker
- [ietf-822] Re: Comment on experimental RFC9078 John Levine
- [ietf-822] Re: Comment on experimental RFC9078 Dave Crocker
- [ietf-822] Re: Comment on experimental RFC9078 John R Levine
- [ietf-822] Re: Comment on experimental RFC9078 Dave Crocker
- [ietf-822] Re: Comment on experimental RFC9078 Dave Crocker
- [ietf-822] Re: Comment on experimental RFC9078 Lyndon Nerenberg (VE7TFX/VE6BBM)
- [ietf-822] Re: Comment on experimental RFC9078 Alessandro Vesely
- [ietf-822] Re: Comment on experimental RFC9078 John Levine
- [ietf-822] Re: Comment on experimental RFC9078 Alessandro Vesely
- [ietf-822] Re: Comment on experimental RFC9078 John R Levine
- [ietf-822] Re: Comment on experimental RFC9078 Alessandro Vesely
- [ietf-822] Re: Comment on experimental RFC9078 John R Levine