IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: End-run

Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no Mon, 25 March 1996 23:24 UTC

Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02101; 25 Mar 96 18:24 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02097; 25 Mar 96 18:24 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15535; 25 Mar 96 18:24 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02090; 25 Mar 96 18:24 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02086; 25 Mar 96 18:24 EST
Received: from domen.uninett.no by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15529; 25 Mar 96 18:24 EST
Received: from trhm8.or.uninett.no by domen.uninett.no with SMTP (PP) id <21630-0@domen.uninett.no>; Tue, 26 Mar 1996 00:24:31 +0100
Received: from dale.uninett.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dale.uninett.no (8.6.9/8.6.12) with ESMTP id XAA02894; Mon, 25 Mar 1996 23:45:54 +0100
Message-Id: <199603252245.XAA02894@dale.uninett.no>
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no
To: Brian Carpenter CERN-CN <brian@dxcoms.cern.ch>
cc: iesg <iesg@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
Subject: Re: End-run
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 25 Mar 1996 16:15:42 +0100." <9603251515.AA21462@dxcoms.cern.ch>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <2890.827793953.1@dale.uninett.no>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 1996 23:45:54 +0100
X-Orig-Sender: hta@dale.uninett.no

It seems that declaring the problem of who gets to publish RFCs
to be an architectural problem and loading it on the IAB is exactly
the right thing for the IESG to do.

We've spent too much time on too many telechats moping about it.
Thanks for offering some justification for this course of (in)action!

        Harald A

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email