Re: a letter

Scott Bradner <sob@newdev.harvard.edu> Sat, 23 March 1996 02:30 UTC

Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05642; 22 Mar 96 21:30 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05638; 22 Mar 96 21:30 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15022; 22 Mar 96 21:30 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05627; 22 Mar 96 21:29 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05621; 22 Mar 96 21:29 EST
Received: from newdev.harvard.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15012; 22 Mar 96 21:29 EST
Received: (from sob@localhost) by newdev.harvard.edu (8.6.9/8.6.9-MT2.02) id VAA20545; Fri, 22 Mar 1996 21:28:30 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 1996 21:28:30 -0500
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Scott Bradner <sob@newdev.harvard.edu>
Message-Id: <199603230228.VAA20545@newdev.harvard.edu>
To: jhalpern@us.newbridge.com, scoya@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: Re: a letter
Cc: iesg@CNRI.Reston.VA.US

> 1602bis >> The results will, however, be
>       recorded by the IESG Secretariat , and made available online.  The
>       IESG may also direct that a summary of the results be included in
>       any RFC published containing the specification.
> 
> This was/is to be changed to read that I will make these results (what
> a term for a letter) available, but not requiring that it be be
> on-line. 


done in a version waiting resolution of the coyright things that
were brought up on thursday in LA

Scott