Re: [Ietf-and-github] Draft: requirements for third-party tools

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Thu, 23 March 2017 19:35 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D7851294F4 for <ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 12:35:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.72
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.72 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=s4+jBFEp; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=f+fhphnh
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sCnXoISzvE-e for <ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 12:34:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A27E8127ABE for <ietf-and-github@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 12:34:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DA7320E01; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 15:34:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 23 Mar 2017 15:34:58 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=z/p3x7uNrPa7Y0ihTR kQjuPqJ0uYfzGhqP3wyCxO3Bc=; b=s4+jBFEpdaku7fBbbfmojDuSEom1lgMrK2 xZ5bz4yHcKm5Yvkzw3EmuBip2Gzoi40yUH1oXZUkRpaL19sYzbrwEwj7bApDgDcG 0pm89Xj/r0A0CaaabzUrwPF7/kl6AfNYD/RGIb8SOtW2bwbKsnITs2BPEjWKoJHY K7TZ0rv7UyG0Fr8beC9zd0RWzdyIDUH0sQYHdv1JVC9iu5cPhPMkFfNuPXOq6Bk/ ZNJOzKjDEoajBWdyLwKNoqkvtLz4YpQQPcQ1k9VkPt2CwVItPHTTC9l+1bkjo9bS A1NweveGJsQFYuKtMVAsEprepU78r+E+1qIVCJ47gNzfy6+irM0g==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; bh=z/p3x7uNrPa7Y0ihTRkQjuPqJ0uYfzGhqP3wyCxO3Bc=; b=f+fhphnh sw5WPCXR2LG/0wkJDk8dlx9m0eXK32FOVnAUcKBzGtsT80yq79bYi978hvXzLa3b XyB8mFhL1wYCqmu9w8e3Y7I0E+fGSgR8hyd5SQ0OHMWw2QnGPlWbg/VPb3uewXYU r2qmkc4pMQd8g/dX3eU2A5GR9xvkIXQU4QHZe+i2tgP57rGqBtLsCfxBuGl3BGF+ 9P70xhO3yi7dk91x76R7ERS3S0w0iUatNLcEOH6OCFKTNug1pbAKPtLr3ESf8ARs UBmbR54VFZ/5Zgdmq9kqZuQtasp0Fj20TqEO6BKk+OvTZJ4Ad+kUu5xalruD/uZV doiLLBY9LKkTtA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:YiPUWB_TPj_t4F9FpjK9YCIv2HaqdRESHg-5Em8rNHMipES96OA7oA>
X-Sasl-enc: gkLqLm3buM7I8GslI2xZO9VrqKeR+G/oAQKCuHmp8vvl 1490297697
Received: from [10.24.43.160] (unknown [128.107.241.178]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 40A90245D2; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 15:34:57 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <8801911B-5E60-4D6D-8AB2-F0D01E69D84E@mnot.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 15:34:55 -0400
Cc: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, ietf-and-github@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <FC53B08F-4E2D-4742-B6D8-649C98582FB3@cooperw.in>
References: <246FA5A3-AEE4-4EBD-9FA4-7B3203B9E0BC@mnot.net> <10165B9B-98DB-4F8C-A1CD-017339AE00E7@piuha.net> <4F33EAF2-FC26-4689-80A6-43FF37D09EB9@mnot.net> <06BB5F2B-760F-4EC1-B887-D67773861064@cooperw.in> <A155BE57-CC0F-4DF3-A83F-3356C442D895@mnot.net> <F9DD9188-73F6-4F9F-948E-4E590DC6BF97@cooperw.in> <8801911B-5E60-4D6D-8AB2-F0D01E69D84E@mnot.net>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-and-github/5u3Clh6rcwFLyDhIxxcEXhorV8Y>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-and-github] Draft: requirements for third-party tools
X-BeenThere: ietf-and-github@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups" <ietf-and-github.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-and-github>, <mailto:ietf-and-github-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-and-github/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-and-github@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-and-github-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-and-github>, <mailto:ietf-and-github-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 19:35:00 -0000

> On Mar 21, 2017, at 9:09 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> 
> How about something like: "When third party tools become so commonly used that the IETF defines best practices for their use, those guidelines SHOULD define what the Secretariat's role is in their use.”

I’m not a big fan of these sort of process documents putting normative requirements on each other. If folks don’t think this is appropriate to include in this doc, the details could just be included in Martin’s doc.

Alissa

> 
> ?
> 
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>