Re: [Ietf-and-github] Single repo vs organization?
Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Fri, 17 March 2017 15:09 UTC
Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BBC7129488 for <ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 08:09:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R7V9zvQSJ9eu for <ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 08:09:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E233C129464 for <ietf-and-github@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 08:09:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::b]) by mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v2HF9MY5026986; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:09:22 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.0.1.13] (reingewinn.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.218.123]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3vl7zQ3wN8zDHDs; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:09:22 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAOdDvNo8PfkK3Vr=MMbeaiT0Xmiz0xVRen0Xa08P25fGxSotUQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:09:22 +0100
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, ietf-and-github@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 511456161.968138-2872606f4d5a87052f2334ddcce35bb3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C3C377A6-82D4-4800-81EE-903469407E8C@tzi.org>
References: <B1A0A921-3034-45B7-BE70-6490BA95A6D7@vpnc.org> <CABkgnnX6Qqhe6D63npbwxUVXa5sOY9AdZ9Ew5Jnb39rY-npjdg@mail.gmail.com> <F3CC8F03-1B28-4944-AFA4-A742B02FC8A0@mnot.net> <b1c4f37b-c6b5-ac29-5d2e-28c57a988a0d@gmail.com> <182C3216-14F6-4D29-AF6B-54FAF71666E8@mnot.net> <46A5629D-57F0-4F39-BE8C-5E94CA67C404@tzi.org> <CAOdDvNo8PfkK3Vr=MMbeaiT0Xmiz0xVRen0Xa08P25fGxSotUQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-and-github/DOdsosNwFukGLy3lvy4-9bPA-jc>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-and-github] Single repo vs organization?
X-BeenThere: ietf-and-github@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups" <ietf-and-github.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-and-github>, <mailto:ietf-and-github-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-and-github/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-and-github@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-and-github-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-and-github>, <mailto:ietf-and-github-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 15:09:28 -0000
> It hasn't been mentioned here that having a single source to look at for all the current work is very valuable for someone getting up to speed and those that don't want to miss something. this is just an indirection problem of course and with enough tooling you can have both (separate repos and an automated wg wide dashboard)- but I haven't seen that done.. For me, tools.ietf.org/wg/core has been a very useful dashboard. It would be nice if we could rid this of replaced drafts. It would also be nice if the chairs could annotate drafts with their github existence. Grüße, Carsten
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Roll call for WGs using Git… Eggert, Lars
- [Ietf-and-github] Roll call for WGs using GitHub Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Roll call for WGs using Git… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Roll call for WGs using Git… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Roll call for WGs using Git… Martin Thomson
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Roll call for WGs using Git… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Roll call for WGs using Git… Martin Thomson
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Roll call for WGs using Git… Carsten Bormann
- [Ietf-and-github] Single repo vs organization? Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Roll call for WGs using Git… Niels ten Oever
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Single repo vs organization? Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Single repo vs organization? Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Single repo vs organization? Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Single repo vs organization? Patrick McManus
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Single repo vs organization? Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Single repo vs organization? Eggert, Lars
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Single repo vs organization? Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Roll call for WGs using Git… Melinda Shore
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Single repo vs organization? Eggert, Lars
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Roll call for WGs using Git… Martin Thomson
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Roll call for WGs using Git… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Single repo vs organization? Niels ten Oever
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Single repo vs organization? Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Single repo vs organization? Martin Thomson