IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ietf-and-github] WGLC for draft-ietf-git-github-wg-configuration

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 05 December 2019 05:08 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 315241200B5 for <ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 21:08:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0uRuYl5eyE5I for <ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 21:08:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot1-x32a.google.com (mail-ot1-x32a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F15B120047 for <ietf-and-github@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 21:08:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot1-x32a.google.com with SMTP id k14so1525886otn.4 for <ietf-and-github@ietf.org>; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 21:08:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Xl8lbD7P8n2qRH7kulGrUJk6dkRj/69fCEJRUYGDMGM=; b=V0uxfiqn5odJZeoXYDgJayhZ0V5LKgdY2j8r8dUTJ4OwarvUoR4oeJl5ZKgrwUQN/y 0YmqJf5DAIOVS7wIAOpc4o1/VVp9M0RuTsxV1RPlUQDEOVG0Jd3WxpxAOVBwJbV1heQB BJO97EjysO0G6CsFn4kgxoTjwphC7TCH4bFHRzb7mqjcU7ezr8G5bcVswm12Yo8Ac97a w6pxC7CGq2uyatu9lMU55gCA5/6oTm3yhEW7SNEYte2JFB3oI61LMHJn1Fwziy/yr62P KtOK5PAp5BTCGOctZ+KVMvROEhQDE42aMDojVWVNvhhIl9xgtq2dSJ12sFGw8kMakoZq LFsw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Xl8lbD7P8n2qRH7kulGrUJk6dkRj/69fCEJRUYGDMGM=; b=U4sQjapEQKlyX6oD2QJtSXej+9szQUNSYRkY4tl9UYYAX9Gea7njiYmmcOux8Ar6sH YBtcjsoGX5irwtdq9HYEDCDvuJk339gK7vQNjWnp/GflXpoTPeBsDPtGzYGui854KnVh RKkyiQOh72xQYroVj6RJJC2knsQl44fxFGkerr/AQ87CM7xiFKNvrVc7H08nIRCXkX6c zf0s+vM6uoQR7QDryTjOA9LsdOflc1llImG/BQxBmFOZLJlDYUyeSKkC6umvfZquiMyC 9I48FuZQhcDOi/t9wXExKPUNTxnYDl74M5liNA7imEFKYYO4DCd2GgBZrFpZO06KN+D6 Z3jg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWfJvHs9qtnLR0u7abBcUJmhIZuSNFYYrBahrrmzYIa02ZGXFU2 HtCi/NwcEOQoRDB/wIZnPzUuL4iYt4W0+xjLGBnUOg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwhZCWOMH7LKO0FdfTJ/R5kkCS81gddqO3/qwFs50+ccNPomwkGDevqjUcDhq/KJA4mnJe5n9+mG4j2FAx3caQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6084:: with SMTP id m4mr5599762otj.4.1575522532815; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 21:08:52 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <d8aaeb5a-b43a-4b66-abdb-a9bae8fe8e6d@www.fastmail.com> <8E4A2E88-5B95-4A7A-AC5D-693AAE7413EE@akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <8E4A2E88-5B95-4A7A-AC5D-693AAE7413EE@akamai.com>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2019 00:08:42 -0500
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+He=U87+EoqsdmLKwGL0UQ9jUVBNi=dAZ4ugSjj96peww@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
Cc: Christopher Wood <caw@heapingbits.net>, "ietf-and-github@ietf.org" <ietf-and-github@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e778fd0598edec0f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-and-github/H-ZiKZHLQrQH7kWwyFj43K2Yg-M>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-and-github] WGLC for draft-ietf-git-github-wg-configuration
X-BeenThere: ietf-and-github@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups" <ietf-and-github.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-and-github>, <mailto:ietf-and-github-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-and-github/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-and-github@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-and-github-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-and-github>, <mailto:ietf-and-github-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2019 05:08:55 -0000

if we do ietf-wg-<wgname> then we can do ietf-bof-<name> ietf-iab-<foo>. etc

that does have some advantages.



On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 12:04 AM Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote:

> >    [1]
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-git-github-wg-configuration/
>
> I read this document.  I dislike ietf-<wgname>-wg as the naming
> convention, preferring a pure top-down approach of ietf-wg-<wgname>.
>
> I am also confused by statements like the IETF should regularly backup all
> repositories.  Who is signing up to do that?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-and-github mailing list
> Ietf-and-github@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-and-github
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email