IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ietf-and-github] Barry Leiba's Discuss on draft-ietf-git-using-github-05: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Tue, 10 March 2020 13:01 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9E6B3A129D for <ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 06:01:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.112
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.112 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-1.463, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3TUC-H-c9-5F for <ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 06:01:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-f51.google.com (mail-io1-f51.google.com [209.85.166.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A00933A12ED for <ietf-and-github@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 06:01:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-f51.google.com with SMTP id h8so12646900iob.2 for <ietf-and-github@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 06:01:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SRzUTnZNM0t/5ibP2TmnjbE7P7lSXU7wOw9AUt8hG9A=; b=CL3RtgmrEyYwZhPlGuvdaVSPRG5uRAFVcjFliH50XfRRRrHdXUl7jMxVcmEp4XPq+x RgFVXkhXwFYcPtI28t5j4e0D9mWeoZXlXRDXr/M6Hi+iTTODBtNJ9MC4bCBivOTrq/e2 DgF2zdFyhV7Sw5dmuXOUOROv35yQW8OMaj3p0rwIa9qYMbne907z0M9sG9+Zf/V7X0Co 8NIcrxly7zYEcZ5KOREg6xqOv+UEtW0lEOoDoeU+MwGNGHi2OipHN30xZXIVcAU5Ebj7 Dolna4n0XPRix4+o9BeNVUcyGER33dl8Sb/gWOy74RVQCBh2GSnHKfUGu9qvAgONxo2l cAXQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ0014qlBT+d9ccl74QlsgtRMiqAr7t2wKRSzxvCmklLrAah2mJg 9KMrSsTDf5GHp6vpuwys+htjSoTQhgQwx4UyWfhJQw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vsG+oUyljDwBGIb2kzhnKfJVpnAz0UqA778osi8+6CgkU7OFlIW+zED+VCzDFcuDY5rlBg9VTLBkZYt3fJqo3s=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:a9b:: with SMTP id 27mr20026616jas.70.1583845267518; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 06:01:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <158373628775.6803.5939811625934781990@ietfa.amsl.com> <d7c70f69-2123-4c18-bb7a-8ff2f73bbba2@www.fastmail.com> <C6ED78A1-F146-403C-96A3-5B872F29F0F6@akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <C6ED78A1-F146-403C-96A3-5B872F29F0F6@akamai.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:00:55 -0400
Message-ID: <CALaySJJcY92YkOK_bXHn9ibELRE9gdB7bn6Ged6vwrWkB=EEPw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
Cc: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>, "ietf-and-github@ietf.org" <ietf-and-github@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-and-github/IdasyYdzh9jk_8jrC7hOYQAAwX4>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-and-github] Barry Leiba's Discuss on draft-ietf-git-using-github-05: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ietf-and-github@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups" <ietf-and-github.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-and-github>, <mailto:ietf-and-github-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-and-github/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-and-github@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-and-github-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-and-github>, <mailto:ietf-and-github-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 13:01:11 -0000

> My only take-away is "what, again with the IPv4 thing?" but if that's the price of clearing a DISCUSS oh well.

There's no DISCUSS on the IPv4 thing.  My non-blocking (very
non-blocking) comment was "why mention v4 at all?", and Érik
abstained, not DISCUSSed.

b

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email