Re: [Ietf-and-github] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-git-using-github-05: (with COMMENT)
Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Thu, 12 March 2020 15:02 UTC
Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B9BA3A0B5C
for <ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 08:02:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.669
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.669 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1,
FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001]
autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 52A0DzRTx4Qs for <ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Thu, 12 Mar 2020 08:02:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr
[132.168.224.13])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9474E3A0A88
for <ietf-and-github@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 08:02:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21])
by oxalide-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP
id 02CF2b2g024298
for <ietf-and-github@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 16:02:37 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 3615D207DFB
for <ietf-and-github@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 16:02:37 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr
[132.166.192.13])
by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BC61207DE1
for <ietf-and-github@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 16:02:37 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.11.240.10] ([10.11.240.10])
by muguet2-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP
id 02CF2al6020458
for <ietf-and-github@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 16:02:36 +0100
To: ietf-and-github@ietf.org
References: <158397412236.19821.1273610782724376897@ietfa.amsl.com>
<0F866C65-65A3-4956-A187-FF39C55E7C43@cisco.com>
<844FE161-95E7-4FCE-BC05-4CD1E6751E9B@isoc.org>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <a3bcbf83-538a-90f4-56db-59b4e702ddc0@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 16:02:36 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/68.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <844FE161-95E7-4FCE-BC05-4CD1E6751E9B@isoc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-and-github/bcEhiaL-jmz_XcUROKLGnFySxMw>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-and-github] Adam Roach's No Objection on
draft-ietf-git-using-github-05: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ietf-and-github@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities,
particularly for Working Groups" <ietf-and-github.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-and-github>,
<mailto:ietf-and-github-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-and-github/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-and-github@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-and-github-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-and-github>,
<mailto:ietf-and-github-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 15:02:47 -0000
Le 12/03/2020 à 15:48, Dan York a écrit : > > I agree with Eric’s comment here… > >> On Mar 12, 2020, at 7:47 AM, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyncke=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: >> >> I agree with your hope but I strongly object to remove sentence. This is already a major issue that the IETF & IESG are proposing a single commercial server; but, at least let's state that it deviates from the IAB statement about IPv6 [1] so let's keep this sentence of course with a timestamp as you proposed. > > > … because I’ve had to repeatedly answer criticism about using services that deviate from the IAB guidance on IPv6 (and the overall promotion of IPv6 throughout IETF activities). Let’s just explicitly state that we are using GitHub with the full awareness that it does NOT comply with that IPv6 guidance. > > Per Adam’s suggestion, perhaps the text of the sentence should be: > >> GitHub is freely accessible on the open Internet, albeit only via IPv4 at the time this document is published. BCP MUST github IPv6. At this time, github.com is not a BCP. This BCP does not recommend github.com. This BCP requires to not use github.com. This BCP states that github.com MUST not be used at this time. Please let us make things simple. Please do not turn and turn and turn statements after statements. Things are what they are lets name them. Alex > > > Regards, > Dan > _______________________________________________ > Ietf-and-github mailing list > Ietf-and-github@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-and-github >
- [Ietf-and-github] Adam Roach's No Objection on dr… Adam Roach via Datatracker
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Adam Roach's No Objection o… Martin Thomson
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Adam Roach's No Objection o… Martin Thomson
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Adam Roach's No Objection o… Adam Roach
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Adam Roach's No Objection o… Martin Thomson
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Adam Roach's No Objection o… Adam Roach
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Adam Roach's No Objection o… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Adam Roach's No Objection o… Dan York
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Adam Roach's No Objection o… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Adam Roach's No Objection o… Dan York
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Adam Roach's No Objection o… Alexandre Petrescu