Re: [Ietf-and-github] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-git-using-github-04

Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> Mon, 09 March 2020 04:08 UTC

Return-Path: <mt@lowentropy.net>
X-Original-To: ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 292B83A1030 for <ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 21:08:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lowentropy.net header.b=TAxU+TIC; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=K9F59uAO
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GQJgX9NOHVEz for <ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 21:08:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0017F3A102E for <ietf-and-github@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 21:08:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 090876B8; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 00:08:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap2 ([10.202.2.52]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 09 Mar 2020 00:08:32 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lowentropy.net; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :cc:subject:content-type; s=fm1; bh=puPFgJBg+boGVejWhPKfVxLITGcp NMeElPc4llXHpYA=; b=TAxU+TICvN5ozUlDOQIHIZT9pLj+ZMCigBr1jyD3p0bk Zo94qcTMTo9TIggWvuB4bs11+7jSG+lhEWPFO8/6Vpsi0P5PkO+a2GRMSgoLIxNz HLvHhvA1zq6JNvBuzPcHeDOKRrIDAjqCFB8GUAxU9pz6isyTXOaZUH8OqV/EduZB sfq2x5e4UzfUW17zDvHRbusDH4IKqHLn/4GyzG9DX6MKzv5Unc3SfngEec4V/F6X BO8y8+1lbtckYAGGdvPUo8OE3uoPbXnZYqjcQcsDNuFHse0QiI3R857TVI/WgwZs Ew7DjYeHEOuQOrDxlgwSVKXudbnKYkBx2gLKrVpyZA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=puPFgJ Bg+boGVejWhPKfVxLITGcpNMeElPc4llXHpYA=; b=K9F59uAOugw6nkrDpJ8eZ+ YU9+MfP+UnD6yaVKG/dNxbzGz2WCWVevL3lqzuSp762BNiI/0KGeNncUzbeqXVea WITgy65XJhjSg/+w8lWpaJ4bntlXcwuuM/G/+sSqGc1Gi4e6wnGrZ20ILAOnWbo7 qvCfFzyAk/Jb0dAn71TEkk60MoJTDOCW1/N4oAfYSV19opjr3+tF2EmkKjLxsnwz 3qs58o90NWGI0weaYioyYLfZrrMZpa2kuC6Vy+yzzR3/6vXWz+MBmzqq8YZlGvdp attDhFOmDKejurO8j3moilcH5s8yYsdx7aacbQwUx8liT5ppHT6OSB0CourIQ9ig ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:P8FlXjai9dtbkkVWAPnG6DDQmehUY9RFdAbnAkBK5-5T0K7FlF12Ww>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedruddujedgieekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesthdtredtreerjeenucfhrhhomhepfdforghr thhinhcuvfhhohhmshhonhdfuceomhhtsehlohifvghnthhrohhphidrnhgvtheqnecuff homhgrihhnpehivghtfhdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgr mhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmtheslhhofigvnhhtrhhophihrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:P8FlXk91zuf0fZt4PdyW7xuZQF-mi-F47I2E6BDje_yARwK5tyi0Bw> <xmx:P8FlXpnBPl75bZPk9iPyg5to4iskffhfjq9pDlvC-eTrrk9QlSRL0Q> <xmx:P8FlXpyZQLe6JwJAQ-Zgcp7lM_MrbyyrMzxLmINADtM2JfFrM9Ebcg> <xmx:P8FlXoKUj8C0cEkoj_qezDxVWa3uz-Styv1Xx_rySshBopfndFGrcQ>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 2E31BE00C2; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 00:08:31 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.1.7-991-g5a577d3-fmstable-20200305v3
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <f1c29108-1710-425e-a6f9-394ab247896e@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <3450f158-be66-71d3-b29a-6751650d64af@gmail.com>
References: <158250611906.1067.14505081937854561120@ietfa.amsl.com> <3450f158-be66-71d3-b29a-6751650d64af@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2020 15:08:10 +1100
From: "Martin Thomson" <mt@lowentropy.net>
To: "Alexandre Petrescu" <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Cc: ietf-and-github@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-and-github/s8_PlzsRx-XT0rfXZObH3hw8nqc>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-and-github] =?utf-8?q?=5BLast-Call=5D_Genart_last_call_rev?= =?utf-8?q?iew_of_draft-ietf-git-using-github-04?=
X-BeenThere: ietf-and-github@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups" <ietf-and-github.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-and-github>, <mailto:ietf-and-github-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-and-github/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-and-github@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-and-github-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-and-github>, <mailto:ietf-and-github-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2020 04:08:34 -0000

On Sat, Mar 7, 2020, at 03:31, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:
> I take advantage of this Last Call about github use at IETF to give my 
> comments about writing I-Ds on github.

Hi Alex,

Thanks for sharing your experience. Taking this back to the Working Group list as it doesn't seem to be a comment about the work.

Do you think that anything in this invalidates the advice and procedures in the draft?  Or suggests the need for additions?  I didn't see anything that suggests the need for changes.  Indeed, your process would seem to fit within the pattern described, with the possible exception of missing a notice for contributors about their obligations (usually CONTRIBUTING.md).

> 3. do not commit the xml file to github before you are sure it
> compiles safely on xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org

I personally wouldn't make this recommendation.  Stuff breaks occasionally and asking people to check is unreliable.  Automated validation on check-in is my preferred solution to this problem.

Cheers,
Martin