Re: [Ietf-and-github] Single repo vs organization?

"Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com> Sun, 19 March 2017 12:30 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82145129490 for <ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 05:30:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=netapp.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6Rulf0q7lfTf for <ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 05:30:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx144.netapp.com (mx144.netapp.com [216.240.21.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC7AF1200C5 for <ietf-and-github@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 05:30:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.36,188,1486454400"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="183047807"
Received: from hioexcmbx04-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.122.105.37]) by mx144-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 19 Mar 2017 05:18:20 -0700
Received: from VMWEXCCAS05-PRD.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.21) by hioexcmbx04-prd.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 05:29:51 -0700
Received: from NAM01-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (10.120.60.153) by VMWEXCCAS05-PRD.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 05:29:51 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netapp.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-netapp-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=zG4VXKSPTNYwTSdofJ6LbyhKrgYUBKhpJ2r98MhV2gw=; b=OxKJp75W6E7GFO01/eEsCBmXicwSNyrgk6xzZAlXipJ8t6v1twQyf+Ormghq4W/S0/pCnu5zIZBLscImYD5bRWVtpgv74wZqcmnpyY0YPbfSWOc57yvO1YZe19D0hxzlSZvI7x3f31hfdBa1ln/UerjvfPiYeQ/MkSI8fwe0kWM=
Received: from BN3PR0601MB1153.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.160.157.18) by BN3PR0601MB1156.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.160.157.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.961.17; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 12:29:52 +0000
Received: from BN3PR0601MB1153.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.157.18]) by BN3PR0601MB1153.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.157.18]) with mapi id 15.01.0961.022; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 12:29:52 +0000
From: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
CC: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "ietf-and-github@ietf.org" <ietf-and-github@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Ietf-and-github] Single repo vs organization?
Thread-Index: AQHSnmB5VRUvPKX6pU2mB9FTo4B8daGYB6OAgAAG2QCAAP1XAIAAGFYAgAL4E4A=
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2017 12:29:51 +0000
Message-ID: <94FD4A8C-7178-425E-AB9B-3CB89C16B2FD@netapp.com>
References: <B1A0A921-3034-45B7-BE70-6490BA95A6D7@vpnc.org> <CABkgnnX6Qqhe6D63npbwxUVXa5sOY9AdZ9Ew5Jnb39rY-npjdg@mail.gmail.com> <F3CC8F03-1B28-4944-AFA4-A742B02FC8A0@mnot.net> <b1c4f37b-c6b5-ac29-5d2e-28c57a988a0d@gmail.com> <182C3216-14F6-4D29-AF6B-54FAF71666E8@mnot.net> <46A5629D-57F0-4F39-BE8C-5E94CA67C404@tzi.org> <CAOdDvNo8PfkK3Vr=MMbeaiT0Xmiz0xVRen0Xa08P25fGxSotUQ@mail.gmail.com> <C3C377A6-82D4-4800-81EE-903469407E8C@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <C3C377A6-82D4-4800-81EE-903469407E8C@tzi.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
authentication-results: tzi.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;tzi.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=netapp.com;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [2001:a61:314f:4f01:994f:3db0:f47e:7345]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BN3PR0601MB1156; 7:OXCY46E0AgAKXS5Idroz/TTj2RKwejvcMPp5OwwNFRj2/Y+GRs2GDDmnthp6ESeJz7qHFzESq54vhRg4f0rrp9/Q5Ev/H3LNc2cRtpaCfeai5Zo78qi+DFLNibYYQtW7ffO0GoPkD+gvkEzuslGBlDh3l2QoP+53E0qymKBr3wa6A4tzfQ/Ep/amgoRysm/Ygo9A7qNWaB3SkMhdq5y6nUppDguuzOtJDM7s12BtvhDN+m7GnUypdaQQeGropdGBDhz8NS+i4pak6WpUtMMfSigmWHLv2M5vDWL1XTcEom1buhm99+lX0Q3Q1q0mgNknHmU3NFNN4lYVqIgaIvTRIQ==
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 10d932b2-bf4b-45e5-b986-08d46ec3a47d
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(2017030254075); SRVR:BN3PR0601MB1156;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN3PR0601MB115660EB008D31B1DC843AABA73B0@BN3PR0601MB1156.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(102415395)(6040375)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026)(6041248)(20161123564025)(20161123562025)(20161123558025)(20161123560025)(20161123555025)(6072148); SRVR:BN3PR0601MB1156; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BN3PR0601MB1156;
x-forefront-prvs: 025100C802
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(39450400003)(24454002)(377424004)(93886004)(36756003)(558084003)(77096006)(33656002)(230783001)(3660700001)(3280700002)(76176999)(6506006)(54906002)(25786008)(53546008)(99936001)(6486002)(53936002)(2900100001)(102836003)(50986999)(6512007)(6116002)(6436002)(99286003)(38730400002)(2906002)(305945005)(5660300001)(189998001)(4001150100001)(7736002)(2950100002)(86362001)(229853002)(6916009)(50226002)(8676002)(8936002)(110136004)(6246003)(81166006)(4326008); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BN3PR0601MB1156; H:BN3PR0601MB1153.namprd06.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D979EE2F-FA84-432C-A85E-A1A9FF9E77B2"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 19 Mar 2017 12:29:51.9560 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 4b0911a0-929b-4715-944b-c03745165b3a
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN3PR0601MB1156
X-OriginatorOrg: netapp.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-and-github/v6k9Ie4jJ7CwTp8mKdmix07zeh4>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-and-github] Single repo vs organization?
X-BeenThere: ietf-and-github@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups" <ietf-and-github.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-and-github>, <mailto:ietf-and-github-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-and-github/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-and-github@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-and-github-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-and-github>, <mailto:ietf-and-github-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2017 12:30:59 -0000

On 2017-3-17, at 16:09, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
> It would also be nice if the chairs could annotate drafts with their github existence.

This sounds like a nice codesprint project.

Lars