IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ietf-and-github] Tracking drafts

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 13 February 2020 21:35 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1A7C12082A for <ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 13:35:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 60cADc-ffQF2 for <ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 13:35:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x231.google.com (mail-lj1-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E230C120803 for <ietf-and-github@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 13:35:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x231.google.com with SMTP id n18so8329004ljo.7 for <ietf-and-github@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 13:35:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=TVgqlR7AMBTaNFtgM/VWq2b9R4KWlbbNdjaEmYi5zbs=; b=MUBMDS+KJhrfkUOLRNCqR51x7B2bxETRBtvF9vthBPSwe3OFGHHTRLkq2dFtykwNwE eCxJGwm2WeCrfZAwJoq0YlEMobF2gS8TplfGFHPCwZ6BHjp/Eklm6xTfUonko9AHPXvX d3COIVfQHv6q5yxR5GkQcumG6axEhxEbbhDGHfki2eIMjn92AQazf5l+qShn24izCutc nJpYVIrK1zf66eP9GzieOWo4f9yj7MY/6XDXjOF5x/Uczd3Onr7sFFyN3yvDa3qfxvh7 Kt3isZjtMIOv5/EVXENe9ApKlYGybPu+PhzF632cWaFN+ZyiEvlCmGb6qoTO1YztNuqu Y65g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=TVgqlR7AMBTaNFtgM/VWq2b9R4KWlbbNdjaEmYi5zbs=; b=pyeSO7saogK7HZUVk9lD30GdQZfZN5+qtlWoAgM0SFl+FAm/puodhWAJWijIx3u+o+ IDMhMPmciyVVX3BT7MRkG5g5IQUcX3KQcph8Q8I7C7kZnZlrDf97yNclQXKvMfrndS0X qKxMW/FtiI2YlSR5qvzt/WMMFODfkX4nLzuq5EI1+c3dqPlbRdrI9jG+hzpuXwKc9muF rM85JSnzPHA1g9UauzeXDLMegmNdKNRWwvxUBhHGtss0ypLjNVI9mOxZ1WEci7G9qNja V78eV2BGABpMX7VjkxrqxFy8sg69ueK/ItYqPKFyJnx80sqc8LwHSD5hDJgCzdhCX+Mh NQeQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXT9/hPVXZ/GOiazqqLMOzRa4SW4nMaMJroS7gO/mXX7uQCNls1 vPFMh8In0wLcVClg/0yCBNKDs26b64y0FEuxppM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw4tGCuItPnm+vksYarV+5OQ4O1jP0LSzg+/xmP7E21uqs2HVjsGavdIFHf5pa3C1rY+uIPziOlrGNDEHu/cU0=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:300e:: with SMTP id w14mr12324177ljw.222.1581629737139; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 13:35:37 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <611506f3-82d4-32e9-5ee2-93e1cd3a6a8a@joelhalpern.com> <0661b222-669f-2904-f7e5-ddbbff5073bd@gmail.com> <c8035f5b-6ff8-594a-2527-fece1955bf35@joelhalpern.com> <3E6E2046-E0C7-46B8-859A-F2B0BC5ADF52@akamai.com> <4ae774ff-0cd5-13e5-6d05-620649a32a17@gmail.com> <da3dcddf-383f-411d-92bb-1f77f64aac4b@www.fastmail.com> <6980b3b7-c287-6b17-f7d0-bbbbc20934da@gmail.com> <CAKKJt-fdk957Zte2ygpvbQgyNh1KpWUJM-fugo2zHd_PA170+g@mail.gmail.com> <08122fcd-771b-4df3-a766-8f7591ef0db0@www.fastmail.com> <CAChr6SykhVyekjfVGH3b+0pXhDtuFBrvDgwStinVCfc2yQ_sCA@mail.gmail.com> <0E1EEFBF-F77B-4202-B54C-CBF9A222C1AD@akamai.com> <7AF2D81C-704A-48C0-A6B2-FF2AE42B6DE2@att.com> <ba7a8858-f961-42ff-a9b1-a8e8686ccdcb@www.fastmail.com> <CAChr6SwBV8xMJKoOqw87k4cQWRLxqk1B_=2hDUrBBPv-H+U9oQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAChr6SwBV8xMJKoOqw87k4cQWRLxqk1B_=2hDUrBBPv-H+U9oQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 15:35:10 -0600
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-ebEA1LJ91ZF0XUDoe_gsBRqP8xQ54AjGkmJt8jxmFfAA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Cc: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>, "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>, "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, "ietf-and-github@ietf.org" <ietf-and-github@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a601fb059e7bde3b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-and-github/xzQtbCWQwrIgDvRYLLLiy741_Vk>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-and-github] Tracking drafts
X-BeenThere: ietf-and-github@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups" <ietf-and-github.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-and-github>, <mailto:ietf-and-github-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-and-github/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-and-github@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-and-github-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-and-github>, <mailto:ietf-and-github-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 21:35:45 -0000

Hi, Rob,

On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 5:06 AM Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 1:14 PM Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> So I'm inclined to take Rich's suggestion here, if only because it
>> clarifies intent better.  I've updated the PR.
>>
>
> Well, I think I've spied a problem here. I have nothing against open
> Github repos, but they are not equivalent to design teams.
>

I agree. I think the point is, from the point of view of an IETF working
group, a design team, and a bunch of people working in a Github repo (who
could, of course, ALSO be a design team), are treated pretty much the same
when they contribute their output to the working group (via e-mail, of
course). The output might be great, middle of the road, or horrible, but
neither's output is privileged among other people contributing to the
working group - it's fair game for the working group, with no
assumption that the working group is bound by decisions that were made in
Github, or in the design team.

At least, I think that's the point we're trying to make here.

Best,

Spencer


> thanks,
> Rob
>
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email