Re: [Ietf-and-github] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-git-using-github-04

Kjetil Torgrim Homme <kjetilho@ifi.uio.no> Tue, 10 March 2020 10:47 UTC

Return-Path: <kjetilho@ifi.uio.no>
X-Original-To: ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 158203A0B88; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 03:47:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xhpGacCS9_9F; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 03:47:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-out01.uio.no (mail-out01.uio.no [IPv6:2001:700:100:10::50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71CAD3A0B94; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 03:47:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-mx11.uio.no ([129.240.10.83]) by mail-out01.uio.no with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93.0.4) (envelope-from <kjetilho@ifi.uio.no>) id 1jBcQ1-0005i4-Kq; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 11:47:25 +0100
Received: from login-osl2.i.bitbit.net ([87.238.42.61] helo=ranger.ms.redpill-linpro.com) by mail-mx11.uio.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) user kjetilho (Exim 4.93.0.4) (envelope-from <kjetilho@ifi.uio.no>) id 1jBcQ0-000GQJ-Vn; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 11:47:25 +0100
Message-ID: <b5ce7680fb00686b7b22f4bf5d8cf6f1a212a519.camel@ifi.uio.no>
From: Kjetil Torgrim Homme <kjetilho@ifi.uio.no>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>, last-call@ietf.org
Cc: ietf-and-github@ietf.org, draft-ietf-git-using-github.all@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 11:47:23 +0100
In-Reply-To: <76525d93-313e-da68-9670-f26a39e532ad@gmail.com>
References: <158250611906.1067.14505081937854561120@ietfa.amsl.com> <3450f158-be66-71d3-b29a-6751650d64af@gmail.com> <68bda8ec830a149be968181d5a10df8881116004.camel@ifi.uio.no> <76525d93-313e-da68-9670-f26a39e532ad@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.32.5 (3.32.5-1.fc30)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-UiO-SPF-Received: Received-SPF: neutral (mail-mx11.uio.no: 87.238.42.61 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of ifi.uio.no) client-ip=87.238.42.61; envelope-from=kjetilho@ifi.uio.no; helo=ranger.ms.redpill-linpro.com;
X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-5.0, required=5.0, autolearn=disabled, UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL=-5, uiobl=NO, uiouri=NO)
X-UiO-Scanned: 870691026939C44B5AF783653131EBAF77AF749C
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-and-github/zXghXWGhzdIEJiai5DyN5eXhgvc>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-and-github] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-git-using-github-04
X-BeenThere: ietf-and-github@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups" <ietf-and-github.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-and-github>, <mailto:ietf-and-github-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-and-github/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-and-github@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-and-github-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-and-github>, <mailto:ietf-and-github-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 10:47:36 -0000

On Tue, 2020-03-10 at 11:29 +0100, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:
> Le 10/03/2020 à 07:05, Kjetil Torgrim Homme a écrit :
> > - despite my efforts of explaining, people still prefer to
> > > exchange
> > > the files by email.  This feedback is from working with several
> > > groups on several xml drafts on several github repositories.
> > 
> > both Github and Gitlab have good web based editors which can
> > recommended to Git skeptics
> 
> I heard that skepticism from many people in a hurry.  They dont have 
> time to get imposed some rule.
> 
> It is difficult to understand some parts of the github behaviours.
> 
> Especially by those who do shared document processing by using other 
> document sharing tools like github.
> 
> This is the gist of it: having a beautiful modern web interface,
> makes one think that GitHub easily supports things like uploading a
> document. It is not the case.  There is no button on the web to
> Upload a file.

it is right up there in the file browser in Github,

  [Create new file] [Upload files] [Find File]

in Gitlab there is a generic [+ v] dropdown menu to upload a new file,
create a new branch etc.

there is also the concept of gist (Github) and snippet (Gitlab) which
is for more informal sharing of files, think pastebin on steroids.

>  Not even to Download a file.

well, that is slightly less obvious, I'll grant you that - the button
is called [Raw] in Github, which you may have to Control click to get
the file download dialog.  in Gitlab there is a separate download icon
(an arrow pointing down into a tray).

-- 
regards,
Kjetil T.