Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-irtf-gaia-alternative-network-deployments-07

The IESG <> Mon, 11 July 2016 20:57 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id E010A12D0E1; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 13:57:27 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <>
To: <>, <>, "Internet Research Steering Group" <>, <>, <>
Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-irtf-gaia-alternative-network-deployments-07
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.27.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 13:57:27 -0700
Archived-At: <>
Cc:, The IESG <>, IETF-Announce <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: "IETF announcement list. No discussions." <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 20:57:28 -0000

The IESG has completed a review of
draft-irtf-gaia-alternative-network-deployments-07 consistent with

The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'Alternative Network
Deployments: Taxonomy, characterization, technologies and architectures'
<draft-irtf-gaia-alternative-network-deployments-07.txt> as an
Informational RFC.

The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work 
done in the manet WG, but this relationship does not prevent

The IESG would also like the IRTF to review the comments in the
datatracker related to this document and determine whether or not they
merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the
ballot and the history log.

The IESG review is documented at:

A URL of the reviewed Internet Draft is:

The process for such documents is described in RFC 5743  

Thank you,

The IESG Secretary