Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-smyshlyaev-mgm-19

The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Mon, 12 April 2021 16:16 UTC

Return-Path: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-announce@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C0F73A24A0; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 09:16:47 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: Adrian Farrel <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org>, draft-smyshlyaev-mgm@ietf.org, rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org
Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-smyshlyaev-mgm-19
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.27.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Cc: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, iana@iana.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <161824420695.29537.10128755619238563207@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 09:16:46 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/5tia3Vtfh6bEp_gkHyM7C5hYY7o>
X-BeenThere: ietf-announce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "IETF announcement list. No discussions." <ietf-announce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-announce/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-announce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 16:16:49 -0000

The IESG has completed a review of draft-smyshlyaev-mgm-19 consistent with
RFC5742.

The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'Multilinear Galois Mode
(MGM)' <draft-smyshlyaev-mgm-19.txt> as an Informational RFC.

The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document and
IETF work.

The IESG would also like the Independent Submissions Editor to review the
comments in the datatracker related to this document and determine whether or
not they merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both
the ballot and the history log.

The IESG review is documented at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/conflict-review-smyshlyaev-mgm/

A URL of the reviewed Internet Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-smyshlyaev-mgm/

The process for such documents is described at
https://www.rfc-editor.org/indsubs.html

Thank you,

The IESG Secretary