Document Action: 'VPLS Interoperability with CE Bridges' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-bridge-interop-06.txt)

The IESG <> Wed, 02 February 2011 22:03 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 831693A687A; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 14:03:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.519
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.519 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.080, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d0k+h8Z+iz+d; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 14:03:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [] (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 590C03A6DFF; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 14:03:09 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <>
To: IETF-Announce <>
Subject: Document Action: 'VPLS Interoperability with CE Bridges' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-bridge-interop-06.txt)
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 3.12
Message-ID: <20110202220309.29341.60305.idtracker@localhost>
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:03:09 -0800
Cc: l2vpn mailing list <>, l2vpn chair <>, Internet Architecture Board <>, RFC Editor <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF announcement list. No discussions." <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 22:03:10 -0000

The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'VPLS Interoperability with CE Bridges'
  (draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-bridge-interop-06.txt) as an Informational RFC

This document is the product of the Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks
Working Group.

The IESG contact persons are Stewart Bryant and Adrian Farrel.

A URL of this Internet Draft is:

Technical Summary 
When CE devices are IEEE bridges, then there are certain issues and 
challenges that need to be accounted for in a VPLS network. The majority 
of these issues have currently been addressed in the IEEE 802.1ad 
standard for provider bridges and they need to be addressed for VPLS 
networks as well. This draft discusses these issues and wherever possible,
the recommended solutions to these issues. 

Working Group Summary 
This document has been reviewed by carriers and experts in the L2VPN WG
and there are no outstanding issues. 

Document Quality 
This document was reviewed by the L2VPN chairs and Mark Townsley.

Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? 
Shane Amante ( 

Who is the Responsible Area Director? 
Stewart Bryant