Protocol Action: 'A YANG Data Model for Path Computation Element Communications Protocol (PCEP)' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-pce-pcep-yang-30.txt)

The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Wed, 29 January 2025 21:54 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Subject: Protocol Action: 'A YANG Data Model for Path Computation Element Communications Protocol (PCEP)' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-pce-pcep-yang-30.txt)
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <173818768220.1310371.5910900371828849267@dt-datatracker-5584d84fb4-tg2td>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 13:54:42 -0800
Message-ID-Hash: RR5TQDSEV6PJSULSNYU5S64HFUQUY5UJ
CC: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-pce-pcep-yang@ietf.org, gunter@vandevelde.cc, pce-chairs@ietf.org, pce@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/E7CHinTmeFU8FpmJhLqmzAY_evU>

The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'A YANG Data Model for Path Computation Element Communications Protocol
(PCEP)'
(draft-ietf-pce-pcep-yang-30.txt) as Proposed Standard

This document is the product of the Path Computation Element Working Group.

The IESG contact persons are Gunter Van de Velde, Jim Guichard and John
Scudder.

A URL of this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-yang/

Technical Summary

This document defines a YANG data model for the management of the
Path Computation Element communications Protocol (PCEP) for
communications between a Path Computation Client (PCC) and a Path
Computation Element (PCE), or between two PCEs. The data model
includes configuration and state data.

Working Group Summary

Was there anything in the WG process that is worth noting?
For example, was there controversy about particular points
or were there decisions where the consensus was
particularly rough?

Finding consensus was as expected for a YANG module: strong concurrence of a few with consensus on
the usefulness.

Document Quality

Are there existing implementations of the protocol? Have a
significant number of vendors indicated their plan to
implement the specification? Are there any reviewers that
merit special mention as having done a thorough review,
e.g., one that resulted in important changes or a
conclusion that the document had no substantive issues? If
there was a MIB Doctor, Media Type, or other Expert Review,
what was its course (briefly)? In the case of a Media Type
Review, on what date was the request posted?

No known implementation so far.
It's a YANG module to be used through a management solution (e.g. NETCONF).
The I-D has been reviewed by the Routing and Security directorates, as well as YANG Doctors.

Personnel

The Document Shepherd for this document is Julien Meuric. The
Responsible Area Director is Gunter Van de Velde.

Protocol Action: 'A YANG Data Model for Path Comp… The IESG