RFC 9607 on RTP Payload Format for the Secure Communication Interoperability Protocol (SCIP) Codec
rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Wed, 24 July 2024 17:20 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-announce@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from rfcpa.rfc-editor.org (unknown [167.172.21.234]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31596C14F6FB; Wed, 24 Jul 2024 10:20:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 461) id 8B5217FA60; Wed, 24 Jul 2024 10:20:32 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Subject: RFC 9607 on RTP Payload Format for the Secure Communication Interoperability Protocol (SCIP) Codec
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20240724172032.8B5217FA60@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 10:20:32 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: QCZZ7ZPE5RBCDFWQT5VHCJ5WMQSM2ITH
X-Message-ID-Hash: QCZZ7ZPE5RBCDFWQT5VHCJ5WMQSM2ITH
X-MailFrom: wwwrun@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-ietf-announce.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF announcement list. No discussions." <ietf-announce.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/Hn3Kk2Eub-ROxRctsQX86rSzntU>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-announce>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ietf-announce-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-announce@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ietf-announce-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-announce-leave@ietf.org>
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 9607 Title: RTP Payload Format for the Secure Communication Interoperability Protocol (SCIP) Codec Author: D. Hanson, M. Faller, K. Maver Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: July 2024 Mailbox: dan.hanson@gd-ms.com, michael.faller@gd-ms.com, keith.maver@gd-ms.com Pages: 15 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-scip-09.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9607 DOI: 10.17487/RFC9607 This document describes the RTP payload format of the Secure Communication Interoperability Protocol (SCIP). SCIP is an application-layer protocol that provides end-to-end session establishment, payload encryption, packetization and de-packetization of media, and reliable transport. This document provides a globally available reference that can be used for the development of network equipment and procurement of services that support SCIP traffic. The intended audience is network security policymakers; network administrators, architects, and original equipment manufacturers (OEMs); procurement personnel; and government agency and commercial industry representatives. This document is a product of the Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC