Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-irtf-nwcrg-nwc-ccn-reqs-09

The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Mon, 16 May 2022 22:12 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>, Internet Research Steering Group <irsg@irtf.org>, Marie-Jose Montpetit <marie@mjmontpetit.com>, draft-irtf-nwcrg-nwc-ccn-reqs@ietf.org, irtf-chair@irtf.org, nwcrg-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-irtf-nwcrg-nwc-ccn-reqs-09
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Cc: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, iana@iana.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <165273915572.61454.8311077331411721469@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 15:12:35 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/LEko_cRPA4lJV3At3ZgqLq7ckBs>

The IESG has completed a review of draft-irtf-nwcrg-nwc-ccn-reqs-09
consistent with RFC5742.

The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'Network Coding for
Content-Centric Networking / Named Data Networking: Considerations and
Challenges' <draft-irtf-nwcrg-nwc-ccn-reqs-09.txt> as an Informational RFC.

The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
MOPS, but this relationship does not prevent publishing.

The IESG would also like the IRTF to review the comments in the datatracker
related to this document and determine whether or not they merit
incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the ballot and
the history log.

The IESG review is documented at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/conflict-review-irtf-nwcrg-nwc-ccn-reqs/

A URL of the reviewed Internet Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-nwcrg-nwc-ccn-reqs/

The process for such documents is described in RFC 5743

Thank you,

The IESG Secretary

Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-irtf-nw… The IESG