RFC 9341 on Alternate-Marking Method

rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Wed, 14 December 2022 21:49 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B95D5C14F613; Wed, 14 Dec 2022 13:49:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.947
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WanHRNYN2rJc; Wed, 14 Dec 2022 13:49:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A9C7C14CF10; Wed, 14 Dec 2022 13:49:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 31B3455D24; Wed, 14 Dec 2022 13:49:50 -0800 (PST)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Subject: RFC 9341 on Alternate-Marking Method
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, ippm@ietf.org
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20221214214950.31B3455D24@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 13:49:50 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/LU8CXFvllPvAmcOcL8GbscxBlC4>
X-BeenThere: ietf-announce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF announcement list. No discussions." <ietf-announce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-announce/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-announce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 21:49:54 -0000

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 9341

        Title:      Alternate-Marking Method 
        Author:     G. Fioccola, Ed.,
                    M. Cociglio,
                    G. Mirsky,
                    T. Mizrahi,
                    T. Zhou
        Status:     Standards Track
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       December 2022
        Mailbox:    giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com,
                    mauro.cociglio@outlook.com,
                    gregimirsky@gmail.com,
                    tal.mizrahi.phd@gmail.com,
                    zhoutianran@huawei.com
        Pages:      22
        Obsoletes:  RFC 8321

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-ippm-rfc8321bis-03.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9341

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC9341

This document describes the Alternate-Marking technique to perform
packet loss, delay, and jitter measurements on live traffic. This
technology can be applied in various situations and for different
protocols. According to the classification defined in RFC 7799, it
could be considered Passive or Hybrid depending on the application.
This document obsoletes RFC 8321.

This document is a product of the IP Performance Measurement Working Group of the IETF.

This is now a Proposed Standard.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Official
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the 
standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this 
memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC