Last Call: <draft-ietf-json-i-json-05.txt> (The I-JSON Message Format) to Proposed Standard

The IESG <> Thu, 01 January 2015 05:04 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id B924D1A1B44; Wed, 31 Dec 2014 21:04:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.9
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7bw46Fy4XN2c; Wed, 31 Dec 2014 21:04:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3826E1A1B36; Wed, 31 Dec 2014 21:04:03 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <>
To: IETF-Announce <>
Subject: Last Call: <draft-ietf-json-i-json-05.txt> (The I-JSON Message Format) to Proposed Standard
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.10.0.p1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Sender: <>
Message-ID: <>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 21:04:03 -0800
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: "IETF announcement list. No discussions." <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2015 05:04:05 -0000

The IESG has received a request from the JavaScript Object Notation WG
(json) to consider the following document:
- 'The I-JSON Message Format'
  <draft-ietf-json-i-json-05.txt> as Proposed Standard

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the mailing lists by 2015-01-14. Exceptionally, comments may be
sent to instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.


   I-JSON is a restricted profile of JSON designed to maximize
   interoperability and increase confidence that software can process it
   successfully with predictable results.

The file can be obtained via

IESG discussion can be tracked via

No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.

There are no IANA considerations for this document.