Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-cisco-sla-protocol-03
The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Fri, 12 October 2012 15:05 UTC
Return-Path: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CFCB21F86AD; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 08:05:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.506
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.506 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.093, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vGaAC17qsF1A; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 08:05:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D46921F86A5; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 08:05:52 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: Nevil Brownlee <n.brownlee@auckland.ac.nz>, draft-cisco-sla-protocol@tools.ietf.org, rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org
Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-cisco-sla-protocol-03
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.34
Message-ID: <20121012150552.19313.13344.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 08:05:52 -0700
Cc: iana@iana.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, ietf-announce@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf-announce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF announcement list. No discussions." <ietf-announce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-announce>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-announce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 15:05:53 -0000
The IESG has completed a review of draft-cisco-sla-protocol-03 consistent with RFC5742. The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'Cisco Service Level Assurance Protocol' <draft-cisco-sla-protocol-03.txt> as an Informational RFC. The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in WG IP Performance Metrics (IPPM), but this relationship does not prevent publishing The IESG would also like the RFC-Editor to review the comments in the datatracker related to this document and determine whether or not they merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the ballot and the history log. The IESG review is documented at: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/conflict-review-cisco-sla-protocol/ A URL of the reviewed Internet Draft is: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cisco-sla-protocol/ The process for such documents is described at http://www.rfc-editor.org/indsubs.html Thank you, The IESG Secretary