Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-cisco-sla-protocol-03

The IESG <> Fri, 12 October 2012 15:05 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CFCB21F86AD; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 08:05:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.506
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.506 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.093, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vGaAC17qsF1A; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 08:05:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D46921F86A5; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 08:05:52 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <>
To: Nevil Brownlee <>,,
Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-cisco-sla-protocol-03
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.34
Message-ID: <>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 08:05:52 -0700
Cc:, The IESG <>,
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF announcement list. No discussions." <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 15:05:53 -0000

The IESG has completed a review of draft-cisco-sla-protocol-03 consistent
with RFC5742.

The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'Cisco Service Level
Assurance Protocol' <draft-cisco-sla-protocol-03.txt> as an Informational

The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in WG IP
Performance Metrics (IPPM), but this relationship does not prevent

The IESG would also like the RFC-Editor to review the comments in the
datatracker related to this document and determine whether or not they
merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the
ballot and the history log.

The IESG review is documented at:

A URL of the reviewed Internet Draft is:

The process for such documents is described at

Thank you,

The IESG Secretary