Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-ucarion-json-type-definition-03

The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Mon, 22 June 2020 19:33 UTC

Return-Path: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-announce@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 779513A110C; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 12:33:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: draft-ucarion-json-type-definition@ietf.org, rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org, Adrian Farrel <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-ucarion-json-type-definition-03
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.3.2
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, iana@iana.org, IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <159285439937.4648.6654694329667483979@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 12:33:19 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/RgvVYhzIs3VYvsTpJ7c-NSKKBU0>
X-BeenThere: ietf-announce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "IETF announcement list. No discussions." <ietf-announce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-announce/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-announce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 19:33:21 -0000

The IESG has completed a review of draft-ucarion-json-type-definition-03
consistent with RFC5742.

The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'JSON Type Definition'
<draft-ucarion-json-type-definition-03.txt> as an Experimental RFC.

The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document and
IETF work.

The IESG would also like the Independent Submissions Editor to review the
comments in the datatracker related to this document and determine whether or
not they merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both
the ballot and the history log.

The IESG review is documented at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/conflict-review-ucarion-json-type-definition/

A URL of the reviewed Internet Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ucarion-json-type-definition/

The process for such documents is described at
https://www.rfc-editor.org/indsubs.html

Thank you,

The IESG Secretary