Protocol Action: 'RTP-mixer formatting of multiparty Real-time text' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-avtcore-multi-party-rtt-mix-20.txt)
The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Wed, 26 May 2021 15:25 UTC
Return-Path: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-announce@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82F583A31F1; Wed, 26 May 2021 08:25:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Subject: Protocol Action: 'RTP-mixer formatting of multiparty Real-time text' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-avtcore-multi-party-rtt-mix-20.txt)
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.30.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, avt@ietf.org, avtcore-chairs@ietf.org, bernard.aboba@gmail.com, draft-ietf-avtcore-multi-party-rtt-mix@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, superuser@gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <162204271050.27280.561200875302525148@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 08:25:10 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/SBUJjD3tE9EekFpGlMwSnruh1dg>
X-BeenThere: ietf-announce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "IETF announcement list. No discussions." <ietf-announce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-announce/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-announce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 15:25:11 -0000
The IESG has approved the following document: - 'RTP-mixer formatting of multiparty Real-time text' (draft-ietf-avtcore-multi-party-rtt-mix-20.txt) as Proposed Standard This document is the product of the Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Murray Kucherawy and Francesca Palombini. A URL of this Internet Draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-avtcore-multi-party-rtt-mix/ Technical Summary: Enhancements for RFC 4103 real-time text mixing are provided in this document, suitable for a centralized conference model that enables source identification and rapidly interleaved transmission of text from different sources. The intended use is for real-time text mixers and participant endpoints capable of providing an efficient presentation or other treatment of a multi-party real-time text session. The specified mechanism builds on the standard use of the CSRC list in the RTP packet for source identification. The method makes use of the same "text/t140" and "text/red" formats as for two- party sessions. Solutions using multiple RTP streams in the same RTP session are briefly mentioned, as they could have some benefits over the RTP- mixer model. The possibility to implement the solution in a wide range of existing RTP implementations made the RTP-mixer model be selected to be fully specified in this document. A capability exchange is specified so that it can be verified that a mixer and a participant can handle the multi-party coded real-time text stream using the RTP-mixer method. The capability is indicated by use of an SDP media attribute "rtt-mixer". The document updates RFC 4103 "RTP Payload for Text Conversation". A specification of how a mixer can format text for the case when the endpoint is not multi-party aware is also provided. Working Group Summary: WG Last Call of "RTP-mixer formatting of multi-party Real-time text" was announced on November 25, 2020: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/tjGlWlXL5a54nhgl5nRV3jkD_tk/ WGLC concluded on December 9, 2020. Of the 6 participants responding to the WGLC, 3 supported Advancement to Proposed Standard, and 3 respondents provided comments, which were addressed by the author. Document Quality: There are no existing implementations of the specification. Personnel: Document Shepherd is Bernard Aboba. Responsible AD is Murray Kucherawy.