Forward: RFC 5546 on iCalendar Transport-Independent Interoperability Protocol (iTIP)
RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 24 February 2010 00:18 UTC
Return-Path: <rfc-ed@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-announce@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-announce@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 924C428C36E for <ietf-announce@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:18:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.255
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.255 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.255, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_93=0.6, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ckw-3V2zJfAG for <ietf-announce@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:18:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::2f]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D143A28C0DB for <ietf-announce@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:18:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 6000) id 789F3130001; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:20:42 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:20:42 -0800
From: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org
Subject: Forward: RFC 5546 on iCalendar Transport-Independent Interoperability Protocol (iTIP)
Message-ID: <20100224002042.GB22574@rfc-editor.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Cc: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf-announce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF announcement list. No discussions." <ietf-announce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-announce>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-announce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 00:18:38 -0000
Greetings All, Please note that we are resending this RFC announcement because were notified that it did not appear in the ietf-announce archives. Please note that the date of publication is December 2009. Please let us know if you have any questions. Thank you. RFC Editor/sg ----- Forwarded message from rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org ----- To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Subject: RFC 5546 on iCalendar Transport-Independent Interoperability Protocol (iTIP) From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, ietf-calsify@osafoundation.org Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:45:21 -0800 (PST) A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 5546 Title: iCalendar Transport-Independent Interoperability Protocol (iTIP) Author: C. Daboo, Ed. Status: Standards Track Date: December 2009 Mailbox: cyrus@daboo.name Pages: 133 Characters: 318143 Obsoletes: RFC2446 Updates: RFC5545 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-calsify-2446bis-10.txt URL: http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5546.txt This document specifies a protocol that uses the iCalendar object specification to provide scheduling interoperability between different calendaring systems. This is done without reference to a specific transport protocol so as to allow multiple methods of communication between systems. Subsequent documents will define profiles of this protocol that use specific, interoperable methods of communication between systems. The iCalendar Transport-Independent Interoperability Protocol (iTIP) complements the iCalendar object specification by adding semantics for group scheduling methods commonly available in current calendaring systems. These scheduling methods permit two or more calendaring systems to perform transactions such as publishing, scheduling, rescheduling, responding to scheduling requests, negotiating changes, or canceling. [STANDARDS TRACK] This document is a product of the Calendaring and Scheduling Standards Simplification Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard Protocol. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the Internet community,and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Internet Official Protocol Standards (STD 1) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html. For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html. Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team USC/Information Sciences Institute ----- End forwarded message -----