Protocol Action: 'Augmented-by Addition to the YANG Library' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-netconf-yang-library-augmentedby-17.txt)

The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Mon, 02 March 2026 19:03 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Subject: Protocol Action: 'Augmented-by Addition to the YANG Library' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-netconf-yang-library-augmentedby-17.txt)
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <177247823050.3627885.12724439690971553935@dt-datatracker-6ff7c68975-7k42g>
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2026 11:03:50 -0800
Message-ID-Hash: ZBEATNTK5LFLIMKNVQ4CHX7FHSZNLT7B
CC: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-netconf-yang-library-augmentedby@ietf.org, mjethanandani@gmail.com, netconf-chairs@ietf.org, netconf@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/T1wCt0VRvqu2T9Ne0gZ50VCvSi4>

The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Augmented-by Addition to the YANG Library'
(draft-ietf-netconf-yang-library-augmentedby-17.txt) as Proposed Standard

This document is the product of the Network Configuration Working Group.

The IESG contact persons are Mahesh Jethanandani and Mohamed Boucadair.

A URL of this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netconf-yang-library-augmentedby/

Technical Summary

This document augments the ietf-yang-library to provide the
augmented-by list. It facilitates the process of obtaining all
dependencies between YANG modules, by querying the network management
server's YANG library.

Discussion Venues

This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC.

Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at
https://github.com/Zephyre777/draft-lincla-netconf-yang-library-
augmentation.

Working Group Summary

Was there anything in the WG process that is worth noting?
For example, was there controversy about particular points
or were there decisions where the consensus was
particularly rough?

>From Shepherd writeup:

There were no particular rough issues. However, worth mentioning is the
limitation augmented-by imposed on module-set which was well discussed in
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-123-netconf-202507240730/ with good
consensus and an updated text in -12 clearly describing it.

Document Quality

Are there existing implementations of the protocol? Have a
significant number of vendors indicated their plan to
implement the specification? Are there any reviewers that
merit special mention as having done a thorough review,
e.g., one that resulted in important changes or a
conclusion that the document had no substantive issues? If
there was a MIB Doctor, Media Type, or other Expert Review,
what was its course (briefly)? In the case of a Media Type
Review, on what date was the request posted?

>From Shepherd writeup:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netconf-yang-library-augmentedby-09#section-6.4
lists 4 implementations. It has been most recently tested and validated at
IETF 123 hackathon.

Personnel

The Document Shepherd for this document is Thomas Graf. The Responsible
Area Director is Mahesh Jethanandani.

Protocol Action: 'Augmented-by Addition to the YA… The IESG