Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-msahli-ise-ieee1609-06

The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Mon, 13 April 2020 17:16 UTC

Return-Path: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-announce@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01E8E3A0FD1; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 10:16:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: "Adrian Farrel" <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org>, <draft-msahli-ise-ieee1609@ietf.org>, <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-msahli-ise-ieee1609-06
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.126.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Cc: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>, iana@iana.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <158679818790.30167.6623942027812186454@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 10:16:27 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/V8tUzWVZXCziNesmF5dlqwIfCfw>
X-BeenThere: ietf-announce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "IETF announcement list. No discussions." <ietf-announce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-announce/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-announce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 17:16:28 -0000

The IESG has completed a review of draft-msahli-ise-ieee1609-06 consistent
with RFC5742.

The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'TLS Authentication using ITS
certificate' <draft-msahli-ise-ieee1609-06.txt> as an Experimental RFC.

The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in WG TLS,
but this relationship does not prevent publishing.

The IESG would also like the Independent Submissions Editor to review the
comments in the datatracker related to this document and determine whether or
not they merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both
the ballot and the history log.

The IESG review is documented at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/conflict-review-msahli-ise-ieee1609/

A URL of the reviewed Internet Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-msahli-ise-ieee1609/

The process for such documents is described at
https://www.rfc-editor.org/indsubs.html

Thank you,

The IESG Secretary