Protocol Action: 'Mapping of Address and Port using Translation (MAP-T)' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-softwire-map-t-08.txt)
The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Mon, 09 March 2015 17:29 UTC
Return-Path: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FFB41A8BBD; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 10:29:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IiHEBqucaW1h; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 10:28:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 496781A90F2; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 10:28:54 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Subject: Protocol Action: 'Mapping of Address and Port using Translation (MAP-T)' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-softwire-map-t-08.txt)
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.12.0.p3
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20150309172854.6716.84657.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 10:28:54 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/Wn8Qbxk30Zac1d7msFqEWHJjos8>
Cc: softwire mailing list <softwires@ietf.org>, softwire chair <softwire-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf-announce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
List-Id: "IETF announcement list. No discussions." <ietf-announce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-announce/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-announce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 17:29:01 -0000
The IESG has approved the following document: - 'Mapping of Address and Port using Translation (MAP-T)' (draft-ietf-softwire-map-t-08.txt) as Proposed Standard This document is the product of the Softwires Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Ted Lemon and Brian Haberman. A URL of this Internet Draft is: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-softwire-map-t/ Technical Summary: The Mapping of Address and Port - Translation (MAP-T) is a double stateless NAT64 based solution. It builds on existing stateless NAT64 techniques specified in [RFC6145], along with the stateless algorithmic address & transport layer port mapping scheme defined in MAP-E. The MAP-T solution differs from MAP-E in the use of IPv4-IPv6 translation, rather than encapsulation, as the form of IPv6 domain transport. The translation mode is considered advantageous in scenarios where the encapsulation overhead, or IPv6 operational practices rule out encapsulation. Working Group Summary: The working group had active discussion on the draft and the current text of the draft is representative of the consensus of the working group. Document Quality: The document has received adequate review. The Document Shepherd has no concerns about the depth or breadth of these reviews. There are several interoperable implementations of the scheme and they have been demonstrated and tested during the IETF meetings. Interoperability test results have been documented in draft-xli-softwire-map-testing-04. Experiences from MAP-T Testing have been documented in draft-cordeiro-softwire-experience-mapt-02. Some of the use cases have been documented in draft-maglione-softwire-map-t-scenarios-04. Personnel: Suresh Krishnan is the document shepherd. Ted Lemon is the responsible AD. RFC Editor Note: This document is one of a set of five softwire documents that should be published with sequential RFC numbers. The numbering should be in the following order: draft-ietf-softwire-lw4over6 draft-ietf-softwire-map draft-ietf-softwire-map-dhcp draft-ietf-softwire-map-t draft-ietf-softwire-4rd