RFC 9342 on Clustered Alternate-Marking Method

rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Wed, 14 December 2022 21:52 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1AC3C13A049; Wed, 14 Dec 2022 13:52:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.947
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ux4Y-U0sHue2; Wed, 14 Dec 2022 13:52:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E804C14F6EB; Wed, 14 Dec 2022 13:50:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 15F9E55D24; Wed, 14 Dec 2022 13:50:32 -0800 (PST)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Subject: RFC 9342 on Clustered Alternate-Marking Method
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, ippm@ietf.org
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20221214215032.15F9E55D24@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 13:50:32 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/ZW3SCzuguZm56UVyVnE7vHpKhHQ>
X-BeenThere: ietf-announce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF announcement list. No discussions." <ietf-announce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-announce/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-announce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 21:52:25 -0000

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 9342

        Title:      Clustered Alternate-Marking Method 
        Author:     G. Fioccola, Ed.,
                    M. Cociglio,
                    A. Sapio,
                    R. Sisto,
                    T. Zhou
        Status:     Standards Track
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       December 2022
        Mailbox:    giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com,
                    mauro.cociglio@outlook.com,
                    amedeo.sapio@intel.com,
                    riccardo.sisto@polito.it,
                    zhoutianran@huawei.com
        Pages:      24
        Obsoletes:  RFC 8889

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-ippm-rfc8889bis-04.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9342

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC9342

This document generalizes and expands the Alternate-Marking
methodology to measure any kind of unicast flow whose packets can
follow several different paths in the network; this can result in a
multipoint-to-multipoint network. The network clustering approach is
presented and, for this reason, the technique described here is
called "Clustered Alternate Marking". This document obsoletes RFC
8889.

This document is a product of the IP Performance Measurement Working Group of the IETF.

This is now a Proposed Standard.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Official
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the 
standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this 
memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC