Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-thomas-namecollisions-workshop-report-05

The IESG <> Tue, 20 September 2016 13:33 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id B45D312B35D; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 06:33:03 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <>
To:, Nevil Brownlee <>,
Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-thomas-namecollisions-workshop-report-05
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.33.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 06:33:03 -0700
Archived-At: <>
Cc:, The IESG <>, IETF-Announce <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: "IETF announcement list. No discussions." <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 13:33:04 -0000

The IESG has completed a review of
draft-thomas-namecollisions-workshop-report-05 consistent with RFC5742.

The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'Report from the Workshop
and Prize on Root Causes and Mitigation of Name Collisions'
<draft-thomas-namecollisions-workshop-report-05.txt> as an Informational

The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document
and IETF work.

The IESG would also like the Independent Submissions Editor to review the
comments in the datatracker related to this document and determine
whether or not they merit incorporation into the document. Comments may
exist in both the ballot and the history log.

The IESG review is documented at:

A URL of the reviewed Internet Draft is:

The process for such documents is described at 

Thank you,

The IESG Secretary