Last Call: <draft-klensin-idna-rfc5891bis-09.txt> (Internationalized Domain Names in Applications (IDNA): Registry Restrictions and Recommendations) to Proposed Standard

The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Thu, 06 February 2025 21:32 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Subject: Last Call: <draft-klensin-idna-rfc5891bis-09.txt> (Internationalized Domain Names in Applications (IDNA): Registry Restrictions and Recommendations) to Proposed Standard
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <173859986027.126383.4748810417579632519@dt-datatracker-6f7f8bdd64-25rl2>
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2025 13:32:22 -0800
Message-ID-Hash: FQJ72VF7TSU4XDJPDIVMPKEOBXTVSXTA
CC: draft-klensin-idna-rfc5891bis@ietf.org, resnick@episteme.net
Reply-To: last-call@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/fYnSIS4DCLlJob5ocEH18hPgiRo>

The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider the
following document: - 'Internationalized Domain Names in Applications (IDNA):
Registry
   Restrictions and Recommendations'
  <draft-klensin-idna-rfc5891bis-09.txt> as Proposed Standard

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
last-call@ietf.org mailing lists by 2025-03-03. Exceptionally, comments may
be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning
of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

Abstract


   The IDNA specifications for internationalized domain names combine
   rules that determine the labels that are allowed in the DNS without
   violating the protocol itself and an assignment of responsibility,
   consistent with earlier specifications, for determining the labels
   that are allowed in particular zones.  Conformance to IDNA by
   registries and other implementations requires both parts.  Experience
   strongly suggests that the language describing those responsibilities
   was insufficiently clear to promote safe and interoperable use of the
   specifications and that more details and discussion of circumstances
   would have been helpful.  Without making any substantive changes to
   IDNA, this specification updates two of the core IDNA documents (RFCs
   5890 and 5891) and the IDNA explanatory document (RFC 5894) to
   provide that guidance and to correct some technical errors in the
   descriptions.




The file can be obtained via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-klensin-idna-rfc5891bis/



No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.


The document contains these normative downward references.
See RFC 3967 for additional information: 
    rfc1591: Domain Name System Structure and Delegation (Informational - Legacy stream)

Last Call: <draft-klensin-idna-rfc5891bis-09.txt>… The IESG