Last Call: <draft-ietf-isis-reg-purge-00.txt> (IS-IS Registry Extension for Purges) to Proposed Standard

The IESG <> Wed, 09 February 2011 16:36 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3EE73A69D1; Wed, 9 Feb 2011 08:36:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.562
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.562 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.037, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O6sC4aAyMZtg; Wed, 9 Feb 2011 08:36:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [] (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 329A23A67B2; Wed, 9 Feb 2011 08:36:53 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <>
To: IETF-Announce <>
Subject: Last Call: <draft-ietf-isis-reg-purge-00.txt> (IS-IS Registry Extension for Purges) to Proposed Standard
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 3.12
Message-ID: <20110209163653.1733.3029.idtracker@localhost>
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 08:36:53 -0800
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF announcement list. No discussions." <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 16:36:54 -0000

The IESG has received a request from the IS-IS for IP Internets WG (isis)
to consider the following document:
- 'IS-IS Registry Extension for Purges'
  <draft-ietf-isis-reg-purge-00.txt> as a Proposed Standard

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the mailing lists by 2011-02-23. Exceptionally, comments may be
sent to instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

The file can be obtained via

IESG discussion can be tracked via

Please note that this document includes a normative reference to ISO/IEC 10589:2002

This last call is issued to draw the attention of the community to the following
Gen-Art observation:

"The (previous) last call did not included the note that for historical reasons the registry 
this document updates was established by an Informational RFC (RFC 3563) 
and therefore this Proposed Standard has a normative dependence upon 
that Informationl RFC."

No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.