Last Call: <draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflection-23.txt> (BGP Optimal Route Reflection (BGP-ORR)) to Proposed Standard
The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Fri, 21 May 2021 19:36 UTC
Return-Path: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-announce@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78F5E3A1E13; Fri, 21 May 2021 12:36:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Subject: Last Call: <draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflection-23.txt> (BGP Optimal Route Reflection (BGP-ORR)) to Proposed Standard
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.30.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
CC: John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflection@ietf.org, idr-chairs@ietf.org, idr@ietf.org, shares@ndzh.com
Reply-To: last-call@ietf.org
Sender: iesg-secretary@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <162162580140.12804.4057428587485376506@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 12:36:41 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/i4Ei7HC9e1ilhxzfAbyNSh7VgjY>
X-BeenThere: ietf-announce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "IETF announcement list. No discussions." <ietf-announce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-announce/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-announce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 19:36:42 -0000
The IESG has received a request from the Inter-Domain Routing WG (idr) to consider the following document: - 'BGP Optimal Route Reflection (BGP-ORR)' <draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflection-23.txt> as Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the last-call@ietf.org mailing lists by 2021-06-07. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract This document defines an extension to BGP route reflectors. On route reflectors, BGP route selection is modified in order to choose the best route from the standpoint of their clients, rather than from the standpoint of the route reflectors. Depending on the scaling and precision requirements, route selection can be specific for one client, common for a set of clients or common for all clients of a route reflector. This solution is particularly applicable in deployments using centralized route reflectors, where choosing the best route based on the route reflector's IGP location is suboptimal. This facilitates, for example, best exit point policy (hot potato routing). The solution relies upon all route reflectors learning all paths which are eligible for consideration. BGP Route Selection is performed in the route reflectors based on the IGP cost from configured locations in the link state IGP. The file can be obtained via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflection/ The following IPR Declarations may be related to this I-D: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3089/