Protocol Action: 'IANA Considerations for Internet Group Management Protocols' to Best Current Practice (draft-ietf-pim-3228bis-07.txt)

The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Tue, 03 September 2024 15:24 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Subject: Protocol Action: 'IANA Considerations for Internet Group Management Protocols' to Best Current Practice (draft-ietf-pim-3228bis-07.txt)
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <172537708764.1381447.14127742444477811687@dt-datatracker-68b7b78cf9-q8rsp>
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2024 08:24:47 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: URCYGBNBK65YGQ2X7O3ONCGM3KNMDMQE
CC: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-pim-3228bis@ietf.org, gunter@vandevelde.cc, pim-chairs@ietf.org, pim@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/lz5fmQik-552MpMf9AGADW_WwPY>

The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'IANA Considerations for Internet Group Management Protocols'
  (draft-ietf-pim-3228bis-07.txt) as Best Current Practice

This document is the product of the Protocols for IP Multicast Working Group.

The IESG contact persons are Gunter Van de Velde, Jim Guichard and John
Scudder.

A URL of this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pim-3228bis/




Technical Summary

   This document specifies revised IANA Considerations for the Internet
   Group Management Protocol and the Multicast Listener Discovery
   protocol.  This document specifies the guidance provided to IANA to
   manage values associated with various fields within the protocol
   headers of the group management protocols.

   This document obsoletes RFC 3228.

Working Group Summary

   Was there anything in the WG process that is worth noting?
   For example, was there controversy about particular points 
   or were there decisions where the consensus was
   particularly rough? 

GV> Process went smooth

Document Quality

   Are there existing implementations of the protocol?  Have a 
   significant number of vendors indicated their plan to
   implement the specification?  Are there any reviewers that
   merit special mention as having done a thorough review,
   e.g., one that resulted in important changes or a
   conclusion that the document had no substantive issues?  If
   there was a MIB Doctor, Media Type, or other Expert Review,
   what was its course (briefly)?  In the case of a Media Type
   Review, on what date was the request posted?

GV> Document quality is good

Personnel

   The Document Shepherd for this document is Stig Venaas. The Responsible
   Area Director is Gunter Van de Velde.

IANA Note

   (from abstract) This document specifies revised IANA Considerations for the Internet
   Group Management Protocol and the Multicast Listener Discovery
   protocol.  This document specifies the guidance provided to IANA to
   manage values associated with various fields within the protocol
   headers of the group management protocols.

   This document obsoletes RFC 3228 and unifies guidelines for IPv4 and
   IPv6 group management protocols.

Protocol Action: 'IANA Considerations for Interne… The IESG