Re: RFC 7707 on Network Reconnaissance in IPv6 Networks

RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 16 March 2016 19:25 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-ed@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AF1B12D6CC; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:25:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.923
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.923 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3nadDYIVEune; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:25:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 629EF12D6AD; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:25:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 6000) id 4565218046B; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:24:27 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:24:27 -0700
From: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: RFC 7707 on Network Reconnaissance in IPv6 Networks
Message-ID: <20160316192427.GD23558@rfc-editor.org>
References: <20160309202133.6D6BF180205@rfc-editor.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160309202133.6D6BF180205@rfc-editor.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/n16gZERYI45uNa-R-THcgoKwlu0>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, opsec@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf-announce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
List-Id: "IETF announcement list. No discussions." <ietf-announce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-announce/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-announce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 19:25:07 -0000

As suggested by
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/JKvBKTnlJAq8j-AGlZJHOhVRMfg,
this RFC announcement is being resent. 

On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 12:21:33PM -0800, RFC Editor wrote:
> A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
> 
>         
>         RFC 7707
> 
>         Title:      Network Reconnaissance in IPv6 Networks 
>         Author:     F. Gont, T. Chown
>         Status:     Informational
>         Stream:     IETF
>         Date:       March 2016
>         Mailbox:    fgont@si6networks.com, 
>                     tim.chown@jisc.ac.uk
>         Pages:      38
>         Characters: 88281
>         Obsoletes:  RFC 5157
> 
>         I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-host-scanning-08.txt
> 
>         URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7707
> 
>         DOI:        http://dx.doi.org/10.17487/RFC7707
> 
> IPv6 offers a much larger address space than that of its IPv4
> counterpart.  An IPv6 subnet of size /64 can (in theory) accommodate
> approximately 1.844 * 10^19 hosts, thus resulting in a much lower host
> density (#hosts/#addresses) than is typical in IPv4 networks, where a
> site typically has 65,000 or fewer unique addresses.  As a result, it
> is widely assumed that it would take a tremendous effort to perform
> address-scanning attacks against IPv6 networks; therefore, IPv6
> address-scanning attacks have been considered unfeasible.  This
> document formally obsoletes RFC 5157, which first discussed this
> assumption, by providing further analysis on how traditional
> address-scanning techniques apply to IPv6 networks and exploring some
> additional techniques that can be employed for IPv6 network
> reconnaissance.
> 
> This document is a product of the Operational Security Capabilities for IP Network Infrastructure Working Group of the IETF.
> 
> 
> INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community.
> It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
> this memo is unlimited.
> 
> This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
> To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
>   https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
>   https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
> 
> For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
> For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk
> 
> Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
> author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
> specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
> unlimited distribution.
> 
> 
> The RFC Editor Team
> Association Management Solutions, LLC
>