Last Call: <draft-ohye-canonical-link-relation-04.txt> (The Canonical Link Relation) to Informational RFC

The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Thu, 01 December 2011 21:07 UTC

Return-Path: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7637311E80BE for <ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 13:07:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.545
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.545 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.054, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JXZQnxGe3SaZ for <ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 13:07:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E23DC11E80A5 for <ietf-announce@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 13:07:21 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Subject: Last Call: <draft-ohye-canonical-link-relation-04.txt> (The Canonical Link Relation) to Informational RFC
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 3.64
Message-ID: <20111201210721.19984.94246.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 13:07:21 -0800
X-BeenThere: ietf-announce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
List-Id: "IETF announcement list. No discussions." <ietf-announce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-announce>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-announce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 21:07:22 -0000

The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
the following document:
- 'The Canonical Link Relation'
  <draft-ohye-canonical-link-relation-04.txt> as an Informational RFC

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2011-12-29. Exceptionally, comments may be
sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

Abstract


   [RFC5988] specified a way to define relationships between links on
   the web.  This document describes a new type of such relationship,
   "canonical," which designates the preferred URI from a set of
   identical or vastly similar ones.

Editorial Note (To be removed by RFC Editor)

   Distribution of this document is unlimited.  Comments should be sent
   to the IETF Apps-Discuss mailing list (see
   <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>).




The file can be obtained via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ohye-canonical-link-relation/

IESG discussion can be tracked via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ohye-canonical-link-relation/


No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.