Protocol Action: 'SAVI for Mixed Address Assignment Methods Scenario' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-savi-mix-15.txt)

The IESG <> Mon, 09 January 2017 15:29 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FF9D129D5B; Mon, 9 Jan 2017 07:29:31 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <>
To: IETF-Announce <>
Subject: Protocol Action: 'SAVI for Mixed Address Assignment Methods Scenario' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-savi-mix-15.txt)
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.40.3
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2017 07:29:31 -0800
Archived-At: <>
Cc:,, The IESG <>,,,
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: "IETF announcement list. No discussions." <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2017 15:29:31 -0000

The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'SAVI for Mixed Address Assignment Methods Scenario'
  (draft-ietf-savi-mix-15.txt) as Proposed Standard

This document is the product of the Source Address Validation
Improvements Working Group.

The IESG contact persons are Suresh Krishnan and Terry Manderson.

A URL of this Internet Draft is:

Technical Summary

In networks that use multiple techniques for address assignment, the appropriate Source Address Validation Improvement (SAVI) methods must be used to prevent spoofing of addresses assigned by each such technique. This document reviews how multiple SAVI methods can coexist in a single SAVI device and collisions are resolved when the same binding entry is discovered by two or more methods.

Working Group Summary

There was nothing noteworthy in the WG process. The WG itself is extremely low energy and it ready to be shut down. This work has been ongoing for a few years and has received several reviews over those years. 

Document Quality

 The document has received several reviews over its long lifecycle. There is a pending version to address the Secdir review. 


The document shepherd is Jean-Michel Combes.
The Responsible AD is Suresh Krishnan.