Protocol Action: 'Early IANA Allocation of Standards Track Code Points' to Best Current Practice (draft-cotton-rfc4020bis-02.txt)
The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Mon, 28 October 2013 16:30 UTC
Return-Path: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B97111E828B for <ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 09:30:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.433
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.433 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.011, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, SUBJECT_FUZZY_TION=0.156, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C2ykfgQxD-Xm; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 09:30:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2211F11E828D; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 09:30:52 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Subject: Protocol Action: 'Early IANA Allocation of Standards Track Code Points' to Best Current Practice (draft-cotton-rfc4020bis-02.txt)
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.81
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20131028163052.4838.32440.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 09:30:52 -0700
Cc: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf-announce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
List-Id: "IETF announcement list. No discussions." <ietf-announce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-announce>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-announce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce>, <mailto:ietf-announce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 16:30:53 -0000
The IESG has approved the following document: - 'Early IANA Allocation of Standards Track Code Points' (draft-cotton-rfc4020bis-02.txt) as Best Current Practice This document has been reviewed in the IETF but is not the product of an IETF Working Group. The IESG contact person is Adrian Farrel. A URL of this Internet Draft is: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cotton-rfc4020bis/ Technical Summary This memo describes the process for early allocation of code points by IANA from registries for which "Specification Required", "RFC Required", "IETF Review", or "Standards Action" policies apply. This process can be used to alleviate the problem where code point allocation is needed to facilitate desired or required implementation and deployment experience prior to publication of an RFC that would normally trigger code point allocation. This document obsoletes RFC 4020. Working Group Summary This is an individual submission, not the product of a working group. Discussion on the IETF list was initially limited, but IETF last call generated some good points and a fair amount of discussion. There was positive support as well as issues that have now been resolved. Document Quality The document has been reviewed by a select set of reviewers although the document (in its previous form and using a different document name) was flagged to the main IETF list. The reviewers who have commented to date are experienced in the IETF process and the use of codepoint registries. This set of reviewers did provide the author with very substantial input There is not (so far) indication of substantial interest from the wider community. This is almost certainly because the process described is a relatively small corner that does not impinge on the day-to-day life of the average IETFer. However, we know that early allocation is used and is seen as important by a number of working groups. We may consider that the IANA function is the expert in operating this type of process, so having Michelle as author is significant. There are no implementations of this new revision of the process. Personnel Adrian Farrel (Adrian@olddog.co.uk) is the Document Shepherd and the Responsible Area Director. RFC Editor Note Abstract OLD This memo describes the process for early allocation of code points by IANA from registries for which "Specification Required", "RFC Required", "IETF Review", or "Standards Action" policies apply. This process can be used to alleviate the problem where code point allocation is needed to facilitate desired or required implementation and deployment experience prior to publication of an RFC that would normally trigger code point allocation. NEW This memo describes the process for early allocation of code points by IANA from registries for which "Specification Required", "RFC Required", "IETF Review", or "Standards Action" policies apply. This process can be used to alleviate the problem where code point allocation is needed to facilitate desired or required implementation and deployment experience prior to publication of an RFC that would normally trigger code point allocation. The procedures in this document are intended to apply only to IETF Stream documents. END --- Section 1 OLD A policy for IANA early allocations was previously described in [RFC4020]. This document obsoletes RFC 4020 and adds other registration procedures to the types of registries that can qualify for early allocation. NEW A policy for IANA early allocations was previously described in [RFC4020]. This document obsoletes RFC 4020 and adds other registration procedures to the types of registries that can qualify for early allocation. The procedures in this document are intended to apply only to IETF Stream documents. END